Skip to main content
fixed broken link
Source Link
EdM
  • 101.5k
  • 11
  • 102
  • 303

There are many things you could do to select variables from multiply imputed data, but not all yield appropriate estimates. See Wood et al (2008) Stat Med for a comparison of various possibilities.

I have found the following two-step procedure useful in practice.

  1. Apply your preferred variable selection method independently to each of the $m$ imputed data sets. You will end up with $m$ different models. For each variable, count the number of times it appears in the model. Select those variables that appear in at least half of the $m$ models.
  2. Use the p-value of the Wald statistic or of the likelihood ratio test as calculated from the $m$ multiply-imputed data sets as the criterion for further stepwise model selection.

The pre-selection step 1 is included to reduce the amount of computation. See http://www.stefvanbuuren.nl/mi/FIMDmaterials/src/fimd6.r.txthttps://stefvanbuuren.name/fimd/sec-stepwise.html (section 65.4.2) for a code example of the two-step method in R using mice(). In Stata, you can perform Step 2 (on all variables) with mim:stepwise.

There are many things you could do to select variables from multiply imputed data, but not all yield appropriate estimates. See Wood et al (2008) Stat Med for a comparison of various possibilities.

I have found the following two-step procedure useful in practice.

  1. Apply your preferred variable selection method independently to each of the $m$ imputed data sets. You will end up with $m$ different models. For each variable, count the number of times it appears in the model. Select those variables that appear in at least half of the $m$ models.
  2. Use the p-value of the Wald statistic or of the likelihood ratio test as calculated from the $m$ multiply-imputed data sets as the criterion for further stepwise model selection.

The pre-selection step 1 is included to reduce the amount of computation. See http://www.stefvanbuuren.nl/mi/FIMDmaterials/src/fimd6.r.txt (section 6.4.2) for a code example of the two-step method in R using mice(). In Stata, you can perform Step 2 (on all variables) with mim:stepwise.

There are many things you could do to select variables from multiply imputed data, but not all yield appropriate estimates. See Wood et al (2008) Stat Med for a comparison of various possibilities.

I have found the following two-step procedure useful in practice.

  1. Apply your preferred variable selection method independently to each of the $m$ imputed data sets. You will end up with $m$ different models. For each variable, count the number of times it appears in the model. Select those variables that appear in at least half of the $m$ models.
  2. Use the p-value of the Wald statistic or of the likelihood ratio test as calculated from the $m$ multiply-imputed data sets as the criterion for further stepwise model selection.

The pre-selection step 1 is included to reduce the amount of computation. See https://stefvanbuuren.name/fimd/sec-stepwise.html (section 5.4.2) for a code example of the two-step method in R using mice(). In Stata, you can perform Step 2 (on all variables) with mim:stepwise.

Bounty Ended with 50 reputation awarded by D L Dahly
added link
Source Link
gung - Reinstate Monica
  • 147.5k
  • 89
  • 406
  • 717

There are many things you could do to select variables from multiply imputed data, but not all yield appropriate estimates. See Wood et al (2008) Stat MedWood et al (2008) Stat Med for a comparison of various possibilities. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sim.3177/abstract

I have found the following two-step procedure useful in practice.

  1. Apply your preferred variable selection method independently to each of the $m$ imputed data sets. You will end up with $m$ different models. For each variable, count the number of times it appears in the model. Select those variables that appear in at least half of the $m$ models.
  2. Use the p-value of the Wald statistic or of the likelihood ratio test as calculated from the $m$ multiply-imputed data sets as the criterion for further stepwise model selection.

The pre-selection step 1 is included to reduce the amount of computation. See http://www.stefvanbuuren.nl/mi/FIMDmaterials/src/fimd6.r.txt (section 6.4.2) for a code example of the two-step method in R using mice(). In Stata, you can perform Step 2 (on all variables) with mim:stepwise.

There are many things you could do to select variables from multiply imputed data, but not all yield appropriate estimates. See Wood et al (2008) Stat Med for a comparison of various possibilities. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sim.3177/abstract

I have found the following two-step procedure useful in practice.

  1. Apply your preferred variable selection method independently to each of the $m$ imputed data sets. You will end up with $m$ different models. For each variable, count the number of times it appears in the model. Select those variables that appear in at least half of the $m$ models.
  2. Use the p-value of the Wald statistic or of the likelihood ratio test as calculated from the $m$ multiply-imputed data sets as the criterion for further stepwise model selection.

The pre-selection step 1 is included to reduce the amount of computation. See http://www.stefvanbuuren.nl/mi/FIMDmaterials/src/fimd6.r.txt (section 6.4.2) for a code example of the two-step method in R using mice(). In Stata, you can perform Step 2 (on all variables) with mim:stepwise.

There are many things you could do to select variables from multiply imputed data, but not all yield appropriate estimates. See Wood et al (2008) Stat Med for a comparison of various possibilities.

I have found the following two-step procedure useful in practice.

  1. Apply your preferred variable selection method independently to each of the $m$ imputed data sets. You will end up with $m$ different models. For each variable, count the number of times it appears in the model. Select those variables that appear in at least half of the $m$ models.
  2. Use the p-value of the Wald statistic or of the likelihood ratio test as calculated from the $m$ multiply-imputed data sets as the criterion for further stepwise model selection.

The pre-selection step 1 is included to reduce the amount of computation. See http://www.stefvanbuuren.nl/mi/FIMDmaterials/src/fimd6.r.txt (section 6.4.2) for a code example of the two-step method in R using mice(). In Stata, you can perform Step 2 (on all variables) with mim:stepwise.

There are many things you could do to select variables from multiply imputed data, but not all yield appropriate estimates. See Wood et al (2008) Stat Med for a comparison of various possibilities. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sim.3177/abstract

I have found the following two-step procedure useful in practice.

  1. Apply your preferred variable selection method independently to each of the $m$ imputed data sets. You will end up with $m$ different models. For each variable, count the number of times it appears in the model. Select those variables that appear in at least half of the $m$ models.
  2. Use the p-value of the Wald statistic or of the likelihood ratio test as calculated from the $m$ multiply-imputed data sets as the criterion for further stepwise model selection.

The pre-selection step 1 is included to reduce the amount of computation. See http://www.stefvanbuuren.nl/mi/FIMDmaterials/src/fimd6.r.txt (section 6.4.2) for a code example of the two-step method in R using mice(). In Stata, you can perform Step 2 (on all variables) with mim:stepwise.

There are many things you could do to select variables from multiply imputed data, but not all yield appropriate estimates. See Wood et al (2008) Stat Med for a comparison of various possibilities.

I have found the following two-step procedure useful in practice.

  1. Apply your preferred variable selection method independently to each of the $m$ imputed data sets. You will end up with $m$ different models. For each variable, count the number of times it appears in the model. Select those variables that appear in at least half of the $m$ models.
  2. Use the p-value of the Wald statistic or of the likelihood ratio test as calculated from the $m$ multiply-imputed data sets as the criterion for further stepwise model selection.

The pre-selection step 1 is included to reduce the amount of computation. See http://www.stefvanbuuren.nl/mi/FIMDmaterials/src/fimd6.r.txt (section 6.4.2) for a code example of the two-step method in R using mice(). In Stata, you can perform Step 2 (on all variables) with mim:stepwise.

There are many things you could do to select variables from multiply imputed data, but not all yield appropriate estimates. See Wood et al (2008) Stat Med for a comparison of various possibilities. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sim.3177/abstract

I have found the following two-step procedure useful in practice.

  1. Apply your preferred variable selection method independently to each of the $m$ imputed data sets. You will end up with $m$ different models. For each variable, count the number of times it appears in the model. Select those variables that appear in at least half of the $m$ models.
  2. Use the p-value of the Wald statistic or of the likelihood ratio test as calculated from the $m$ multiply-imputed data sets as the criterion for further stepwise model selection.

The pre-selection step 1 is included to reduce the amount of computation. See http://www.stefvanbuuren.nl/mi/FIMDmaterials/src/fimd6.r.txt (section 6.4.2) for a code example of the two-step method in R using mice(). In Stata, you can perform Step 2 (on all variables) with mim:stepwise.

formatting
Source Link
StasK
  • 32.3k
  • 2
  • 101
  • 193
Loading
Source Link
Loading