Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 8, 2022 at 22:46 comment added usεr11852 Please someone mention isotonic regression, Platt scaling and beta calibration.
Mar 8, 2022 at 21:26 answer added ljubomir timeline score: 2
Mar 3, 2022 at 10:06 comment added Lodinn If you want to add some special consideration to these extreme outliers, consider transforming your loss function: as of now, if going from 0.97 to 0.99 means that the predictions between say 0.2 and 0.8 would shift ever so slightly off the target, the model might "think" of it as an overall deterioration - you might have a different opinion. Make your target function reflect what you actually want out of the model!
Mar 3, 2022 at 3:03 history became hot network question
Mar 3, 2022 at 0:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackStats/status/1499172717077147648
Mar 2, 2022 at 20:02 answer added Tim timeline score: 5
Mar 2, 2022 at 19:52 answer added Sycorax timeline score: 7
Mar 2, 2022 at 19:20 comment added dfried @Sycorax edited. Thanks! One comment on features: Right now it's just time, score, and the teams' qualities. I'll add more eventually, but given these features alone, I would expect the model to pick up on the fact that given certain time-score combinations, there aren't any features that are going to drag the probability away from 0 or 1
Mar 2, 2022 at 19:19 history edited dfried CC BY-SA 4.0
added 936 characters in body
Mar 2, 2022 at 19:13 comment added Eli Are 0.03 and 0.97 meaningly different from .0001 or .9999? Are you still classifying 0.03 as 0 and 0.97 as 1? If so, it's probably not worth examining further.
Mar 2, 2022 at 19:12 comment added Sycorax How do you know that the probability should be $10^{-4}$ instead of 0.03? What hyperparmeters are you using? How many observations, features, and members of each class do you have? What is your loss function? Please edit to clarify.
S Mar 2, 2022 at 18:58 review First questions
Mar 2, 2022 at 19:13
S Mar 2, 2022 at 18:58 history asked dfried CC BY-SA 4.0