Timeline for Custom (Asymmetric?) Loss Function for Tabular Regression: Preferring underestimation
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2022 at 10:42 | comment | added | Alberto | @whuber yes, however he already have a solution for the "unbalanced" using a system of equation, he just needed a scale invariant loss | |
| Jul 13, 2022 at 20:55 | history | undeleted | Alberto | ||
| Jul 13, 2022 at 17:40 | history | deleted | Alberto | via Vote | |
| Jul 13, 2022 at 17:38 | history | undeleted | Alberto | ||
| Jul 13, 2022 at 17:34 | history | deleted | Alberto | via Vote | |
| Jul 13, 2022 at 17:32 | history | undeleted | Alberto | ||
| Jul 13, 2022 at 17:30 | history | deleted | Alberto | via Vote | |
| Jul 13, 2022 at 17:30 | history | edited | anon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 148 characters in body
|
| Jul 13, 2022 at 17:29 | comment | added | whuber♦ | Isn't this the opposite of the asymmetric loss the question is looking for? | |
| Jul 13, 2022 at 17:26 | history | answered | anon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |