Timeline for Geometrical interpretation of why can't ridge regression shrink coefficients to 0?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2022 at 11:30 | answer | added | Sextus Empiricus | timeline score: 3 | |
| Sep 2, 2022 at 7:03 | answer | added | Tim | timeline score: 4 | |
| Sep 2, 2022 at 5:37 | comment | added | Deepak Tatyaji Ahire | Edited the question. Now I request the people to focus on the problem and not on the other unnecessary stuff | |
| Sep 2, 2022 at 5:36 | history | edited | Deepak Tatyaji Ahire | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 13 characters in body
|
| Sep 1, 2022 at 19:51 | history | edited | Deepak Tatyaji Ahire | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 448 characters in body
|
| Sep 1, 2022 at 18:49 | comment | added | Tim | As you could learn from my answer to your other question nobody claims that the parameter won't be zero. It is just not the point of this regularization. The same, you could have parameters equal to zeros without using any regularization. You'll find good explanation of the geometry here stats.stackexchange.com/a/30530/35989 | |
| Sep 1, 2022 at 18:30 | history | asked | Deepak Tatyaji Ahire | CC BY-SA 4.0 |