Skip to main content
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user

I am having some difficulty identifying the appropriate glmGLM family for my proportional data in a mixed model. My response data is inherently proportional (0,1) but also includes values of 1. myMy proposed model:

prop.surv1 <- glmmTMB(worker.prop ~ Source.pop + (1 | Colony_ID) + (1 | Col_Season),
                      weights= Worker.start, family = quasi_binomial(), data=count)

I have had trouble modeling this with different family types since glmer()glmer() and glmmTMB()glmmTMB() no longer include the quasi-binomial family.

I've tried out using the beta_family()beta_family() arg but the beta_family()beta_family() arg uses a 'logit' link which does not match my data since it includes some values of 1.

Any suggestions that might work for fitting proportional data still within glmmTMBglmmTMB?

Thank you,.

I am having some difficulty identifying the appropriate glm family for my proportional data in a mixed model. My response data is inherently proportional (0,1) but also includes values of 1. my proposed model:

prop.surv1 <- glmmTMB(worker.prop ~ Source.pop + (1 | Colony_ID) + (1 | Col_Season),
                      weights= Worker.start, family = quasi_binomial(), data=count)

I have had trouble modeling this with different family types since glmer() and glmmTMB() no longer include the quasi-binomial family.

I've tried out using the beta_family() arg but the beta_family() arg uses a 'logit' link which does not match my data since it includes some values of 1

Any suggestions that might work for fitting proportional data still within glmmTMB?

Thank you,

I am having some difficulty identifying the appropriate GLM family for my proportional data in a mixed model. My response data is inherently proportional (0,1) but also includes values of 1. My proposed model:

prop.surv1 <- glmmTMB(worker.prop ~ Source.pop + (1 | Colony_ID) + (1 | Col_Season),
                      weights= Worker.start, family = quasi_binomial(), data=count)

I have had trouble modeling this with different family types since glmer() and glmmTMB() no longer include the quasi-binomial family.

I've tried out using the beta_family() arg but the beta_family() arg uses a 'logit' link which does not match my data since it includes some values of 1.

Any suggestions that might work for fitting proportional data still within glmmTMB?

Thank you.

Source Link
egp
  • 21
  • 2

Modeling proportion data in glmmTMB without 'quasi-binomial' family

I am having some difficulty identifying the appropriate glm family for my proportional data in a mixed model. My response data is inherently proportional (0,1) but also includes values of 1. my proposed model:

prop.surv1 <- glmmTMB(worker.prop ~ Source.pop + (1 | Colony_ID) + (1 | Col_Season),
                      weights= Worker.start, family = quasi_binomial(), data=count)

I have had trouble modeling this with different family types since glmer() and glmmTMB() no longer include the quasi-binomial family.

I've tried out using the beta_family() arg but the beta_family() arg uses a 'logit' link which does not match my data since it includes some values of 1

Any suggestions that might work for fitting proportional data still within glmmTMB?

Thank you,