Timeline for Making sense of this section on likelihood of order statistics
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 8, 2022 at 7:43 | vote | accept | The Pointer | ||
S Dec 8, 2022 at 7:43 | history | bounty ended | The Pointer | ||
S Dec 8, 2022 at 7:43 | history | notice removed | The Pointer | ||
Dec 7, 2022 at 16:00 | comment | added | whuber♦ | See, then, the first section of stats.stackexchange.com/a/130174/919 for more details. | |
Dec 7, 2022 at 4:19 | vote | accept | The Pointer | ||
Dec 7, 2022 at 4:19 | |||||
Dec 7, 2022 at 4:16 | history | edited | The Pointer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
Dec 6, 2022 at 9:11 | answer | added | Sextus Empiricus | timeline score: 1 | |
S Dec 5, 2022 at 23:45 | history | bounty started | The Pointer | ||
S Dec 5, 2022 at 23:45 | history | notice added | The Pointer | Draw attention | |
Dec 4, 2022 at 8:38 | comment | added | The Pointer | @whuber I don't see how this addresses my questions. | |
Dec 4, 2022 at 2:54 | history | edited | The Pointer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
Dec 3, 2022 at 22:07 | comment | added | whuber♦ | The multinomial argument isn't needed for the maximum example: just differentiate the distribution function to obtain the result. The general argument is similar to, and in the same spirit, as the one I made in a post at stats.stackexchange.com/a/225990/919. | |
Dec 3, 2022 at 21:29 | history | asked | The Pointer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |