Skip to main content
added 255 characters in body
Source Link
mkt
  • 20.4k
  • 11
  • 81
  • 187
  1. You have a binary response (osteophytes), for which regression is a good general approach.
  2. You have non-independence due to multiple measurements on the same participant and multiple measurements by the same examiner. ThisThe non-independence due to participants can be addressed well using s, also known as hierarchical models. Since you have only 4 examiners, which is a rather low number of levels for a random effect, you may want to include examiner as a fixed effect instead. You will need to consider whether including a device x examiner interaction is a good idea or not.
  3. You are primarily interested in establishing that the cheaper device is not worse i.e. establishing . This can be done with logistic regression, and we have some info at this thread: Noninferiority Using Logistic Regression.

So, use a mixed-effects logistic regression with a random effectseffect for both participant and examiner. Then check for non-inferiority of the cheaper device.

  1. You have a binary response (osteophytes), for which regression is a good general approach.
  2. You have non-independence due to multiple measurements on the same participant and multiple measurements by the same examiner. This non-independence can be addressed well using s, also known as hierarchical models.
  3. You are primarily interested in establishing that the cheaper device is not worse i.e. establishing . This can be done with logistic regression, and we have some info at this thread: Noninferiority Using Logistic Regression.

So, use a mixed-effects logistic regression with random effects for both participant and examiner. Then check for non-inferiority of the cheaper device.

  1. You have a binary response (osteophytes), for which regression is a good general approach.
  2. You have non-independence due to multiple measurements on the same participant and multiple measurements by the same examiner. The non-independence due to participants can be addressed well using s, also known as hierarchical models. Since you have only 4 examiners, which is a rather low number of levels for a random effect, you may want to include examiner as a fixed effect instead. You will need to consider whether including a device x examiner interaction is a good idea or not.
  3. You are primarily interested in establishing that the cheaper device is not worse i.e. establishing . This can be done with logistic regression, and we have some info at this thread: Noninferiority Using Logistic Regression.

So, use a mixed-effects logistic regression with a random effect for participant. Then check for non-inferiority of the cheaper device.

added 51 characters in body
Source Link
mkt
  • 20.4k
  • 11
  • 81
  • 187
  1. You have a binary response (osteophytes), for which regression is a good general approach.
  2. You have non-independence due to multiple measurements on the same participant and multiple measurements by the same examiner. This non-independence can be addressed well using s, also known as hierarchical models.
  3. You are primarily interested in establishing that the cheaper device is not worse i.e. establishing . This can be done with logistic regression, and we have some info at this thread: Noninferiority Using Logistic Regression.

So, use a mixed-effects logistic regression with random effects for both participant and thenexaminer. Then check for non-inferiority of the cheaper device.

  1. You have a binary response (osteophytes), for which regression is a good general approach.
  2. You have non-independence due to multiple measurements on the same participant and multiple measurements by the same examiner. This non-independence can be addressed well using s, also known as hierarchical models.
  3. You are primarily interested in establishing that the cheaper device is not worse i.e. establishing . This can be done with logistic regression, and we have some info at this thread: Noninferiority Using Logistic Regression.

So, use a mixed-effects logistic regression and then check for non-inferiority of the cheaper device.

  1. You have a binary response (osteophytes), for which regression is a good general approach.
  2. You have non-independence due to multiple measurements on the same participant and multiple measurements by the same examiner. This non-independence can be addressed well using s, also known as hierarchical models.
  3. You are primarily interested in establishing that the cheaper device is not worse i.e. establishing . This can be done with logistic regression, and we have some info at this thread: Noninferiority Using Logistic Regression.

So, use a mixed-effects logistic regression with random effects for both participant and examiner. Then check for non-inferiority of the cheaper device.

Source Link
mkt
  • 20.4k
  • 11
  • 81
  • 187

  1. You have a binary response (osteophytes), for which regression is a good general approach.
  2. You have non-independence due to multiple measurements on the same participant and multiple measurements by the same examiner. This non-independence can be addressed well using s, also known as hierarchical models.
  3. You are primarily interested in establishing that the cheaper device is not worse i.e. establishing . This can be done with logistic regression, and we have some info at this thread: Noninferiority Using Logistic Regression.

So, use a mixed-effects logistic regression and then check for non-inferiority of the cheaper device.