Timeline for Are these two equivalent forms for the likelihood of a Poisson point process?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5 at 18:42 | comment | added | picky_porpoise | @ThePointer If you find my answer helpful, consider accepting it. Thanks | |
| Nov 12, 2023 at 20:26 | answer | added | picky_porpoise | timeline score: 6 | |
| Oct 20, 2023 at 18:21 | comment | added | whuber♦ | Well, once you rectify those inconsistencies, you will readily see the two expressions for $L$ are related by a constant of proportionality. But I don't see any references to "$\mu$" anywhere and it's unclear what you consider the likelihood to be a function of. | |
| Oct 20, 2023 at 13:46 | comment | added | The Pointer | @whuber The $x_i$ are the points/occurrences, $N$ is the total number of points/occurrences, and $\mu$ is the position/location in $W$. I guess the lower $u_i$ should be $x_i$. | |
| Oct 20, 2023 at 13:44 | history | edited | The Pointer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 308 characters in body
|
| Oct 20, 2023 at 13:44 | comment | added | whuber♦ | Please explain the extra variables that appear in the formulas: the $x_i$ at top (which are not in the left hand side) and the $u_i$ at the bottom (ditto). How are they related? And is $N=n$? | |
| Oct 20, 2023 at 12:59 | history | asked | The Pointer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |