Timeline for Standard deviation of standard deviation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 4, 2017 at 16:12 | comment | added | Harvey Motulsky | @gung . I rewrote to properly explain the confidence interval. | |
Feb 4, 2017 at 16:11 | comment | added | Harvey Motulsky | @Macro. Thanks for your comments. I rewrote substantially. | |
Feb 4, 2017 at 16:10 | history | edited | Harvey Motulsky | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
total rewrite to expand and clarify
|
Jun 8, 2012 at 12:18 | comment | added | Macro | What is "I think both the concept and the terminology of "SD of SD" is too slippery to tackle" supposed to mean? The sample standard deviation is a random variable that has a standard deviation. | |
May 17, 2012 at 16:37 | comment | added | gung - Reinstate Monica | For what it's worth, I'm uncomfortable with the statement "a confidence interval that is 95%... likely to contain the true SD" (or, stated more explicitly in the linked page: "you can be 95% sure that the CI computed from the sample SD contains the true population SD"). I think these statements flirt w/ reinforcing a popular misconception, see here, eg, for a related discussion on CV. | |
Jul 26, 2010 at 19:50 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | moved from User.Id=88 by developer User.Id=4454 | |
May 17, 2012 at 16:40 | |||||
Jul 26, 2010 at 19:50 | comment | added | user88 | I can do Monte Carlo, I just wanted to do in a more 'sciency' way; still you're right that the distribution is not normal, so this sd will be useless for testing. | |
Jul 26, 2010 at 19:34 | history | answered | Harvey Motulsky | CC BY-SA 2.5 |