Skip to main content
added 7 characters in body
Source Link
Raul
  • 11
  • 1

I just want to point out that the standard deviation of $s$ can be well approximated by $SD(s)\approx \sigma/\sqrt{2n}$$\text{SD}(s)\approx \sigma/\sqrt{2n}$ when $n$ is large. The relative error is less than 0.38% for $n=100$ and decreases even further for larger values of $n$.


One way to derive this result applies the asymptotic expansion of the Gamma function to Macro's formula (elsewhere in this thread),

$$\sigma \sqrt{ 1 - \frac{2}{n-1} \cdot \left( \frac{ \Gamma(n/2) }{ \Gamma( \frac{n-1}{2} ) } \right)^2} = \sigma\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2n}} + \frac{3}{2^2\sqrt{(2n)^3}} + \frac{15}{2^5\sqrt{(2n)^5}} + \cdots\right)$$

This shows that (at least eventually) the approximation is a little too low. A plot of their ratio shows this is always the case:

enter image description here

I just want to point out that the standard deviation of $s$ can be well approximated by $SD(s)\approx \sigma/\sqrt{2n}$ when $n$ is large. The relative error is less than 0.38% for $n=100$ and decreases even further for larger values of $n$.


One way to derive this result applies the asymptotic expansion of the Gamma function to Macro's formula (elsewhere in this thread),

$$\sigma \sqrt{ 1 - \frac{2}{n-1} \cdot \left( \frac{ \Gamma(n/2) }{ \Gamma( \frac{n-1}{2} ) } \right)^2} = \sigma\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2n}} + \frac{3}{2^2\sqrt{(2n)^3}} + \frac{15}{2^5\sqrt{(2n)^5}} + \cdots\right)$$

This shows that (at least eventually) the approximation is a little too low. A plot of their ratio shows this is always the case:

enter image description here

I just want to point out that the standard deviation of $s$ can be well approximated by $\text{SD}(s)\approx \sigma/\sqrt{2n}$ when $n$ is large. The relative error is less than 0.38% for $n=100$ and decreases even further for larger values of $n$.


One way to derive this result applies the asymptotic expansion of the Gamma function to Macro's formula (elsewhere in this thread),

$$\sigma \sqrt{ 1 - \frac{2}{n-1} \cdot \left( \frac{ \Gamma(n/2) }{ \Gamma( \frac{n-1}{2} ) } \right)^2} = \sigma\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2n}} + \frac{3}{2^2\sqrt{(2n)^3}} + \frac{15}{2^5\sqrt{(2n)^5}} + \cdots\right)$$

This shows that (at least eventually) the approximation is a little too low. A plot of their ratio shows this is always the case:

enter image description here

deleted 14 characters in body
Source Link
Raul
  • 11
  • 1

I just want to point out that the standard deviation of $\hat\sigma$$s$ can be well approximated by $SD(\sigma)\approx \sigma/\sqrt{2n}$$SD(s)\approx \sigma/\sqrt{2n}$ when $n$ is large. The relative error is less than 0.38% for $n=100$ and decreases even further for larger values of $n$.


One way to derive this result applies the asymptotic expansion of the Gamma function to Macro's formula (elsewhere in this thread),

$$\sigma \sqrt{ 1 - \frac{2}{n-1} \cdot \left( \frac{ \Gamma(n/2) }{ \Gamma( \frac{n-1}{2} ) } \right)^2} = \sigma\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2n}} + \frac{3}{2^2\sqrt{(2n)^3}} + \frac{15}{2^5\sqrt{(2n)^5}} + \cdots\right)$$

This shows that (at least eventually) the approximation is a little too low. A plot of their ratio shows this is always the case:

enter image description here

I just want to point out that the standard deviation of $\hat\sigma$ can be well approximated by $SD(\sigma)\approx \sigma/\sqrt{2n}$ when $n$ is large. The relative error is less than 0.38% for $n=100$ and decreases even further for larger values of $n$.


One way to derive this result applies the asymptotic expansion of the Gamma function to Macro's formula (elsewhere in this thread),

$$\sigma \sqrt{ 1 - \frac{2}{n-1} \cdot \left( \frac{ \Gamma(n/2) }{ \Gamma( \frac{n-1}{2} ) } \right)^2} = \sigma\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2n}} + \frac{3}{2^2\sqrt{(2n)^3}} + \frac{15}{2^5\sqrt{(2n)^5}} + \cdots\right)$$

This shows that (at least eventually) the approximation is a little too low. A plot of their ratio shows this is always the case:

enter image description here

I just want to point out that the standard deviation of $s$ can be well approximated by $SD(s)\approx \sigma/\sqrt{2n}$ when $n$ is large. The relative error is less than 0.38% for $n=100$ and decreases even further for larger values of $n$.


One way to derive this result applies the asymptotic expansion of the Gamma function to Macro's formula (elsewhere in this thread),

$$\sigma \sqrt{ 1 - \frac{2}{n-1} \cdot \left( \frac{ \Gamma(n/2) }{ \Gamma( \frac{n-1}{2} ) } \right)^2} = \sigma\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2n}} + \frac{3}{2^2\sqrt{(2n)^3}} + \frac{15}{2^5\sqrt{(2n)^5}} + \cdots\right)$$

This shows that (at least eventually) the approximation is a little too low. A plot of their ratio shows this is always the case:

enter image description here

added 458 characters in body
Source Link
whuber
  • 333.5k
  • 63
  • 792
  • 1.3k

I just want to point out that the standard deviation of $\sigma$$\hat\sigma$ can be well approximated by $SD(\sigma)\approx \sigma/\sqrt{2n}$ when $n$ is large. The relative error is less than 0.38% for $n=100$ and decreases even further for larger values of $n$.


One way to derive this result applies the asymptotic expansion of the Gamma function to Macro's formula (elsewhere in this thread),

$$\sigma \sqrt{ 1 - \frac{2}{n-1} \cdot \left( \frac{ \Gamma(n/2) }{ \Gamma( \frac{n-1}{2} ) } \right)^2} = \sigma\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2n}} + \frac{3}{2^2\sqrt{(2n)^3}} + \frac{15}{2^5\sqrt{(2n)^5}} + \cdots\right)$$

This shows that (at least eventually) the approximation is a little too low. A plot of their ratio shows this is always the case:

enter image description here

I just want to point out that the standard deviation of $\sigma$ can be well approximated by $SD(\sigma)\approx \sigma/\sqrt{2n}$ when $n$ is large. The relative error is less than 0.38% for $n=100$ and decreases even further for larger values of $n$.

I just want to point out that the standard deviation of $\hat\sigma$ can be well approximated by $SD(\sigma)\approx \sigma/\sqrt{2n}$ when $n$ is large. The relative error is less than 0.38% for $n=100$ and decreases even further for larger values of $n$.


One way to derive this result applies the asymptotic expansion of the Gamma function to Macro's formula (elsewhere in this thread),

$$\sigma \sqrt{ 1 - \frac{2}{n-1} \cdot \left( \frac{ \Gamma(n/2) }{ \Gamma( \frac{n-1}{2} ) } \right)^2} = \sigma\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2n}} + \frac{3}{2^2\sqrt{(2n)^3}} + \frac{15}{2^5\sqrt{(2n)^5}} + \cdots\right)$$

This shows that (at least eventually) the approximation is a little too low. A plot of their ratio shows this is always the case:

enter image description here

Post Undeleted by whuber
Post Deleted by Sycorax
added 1 character in body
Source Link
Raul
  • 11
  • 1
Loading
Source Link
Raul
  • 11
  • 1
Loading