Skip to main content
added 12 characters in body
Source Link

Set aside the theoretical issues related to extreme observations, I would not advise ttest anyway, as you seem to have 3 groups of observations. Hence, you would be probably better with ANOVA and subsequent multiple comparisons.

Moreover, as far as your zero-spenders are concerned, I would try to understand how many of them are systematic zeros (that is, people who cannot afford to spend money because they cannot rely upon a disposable income) vs sample zeros (that is, people who are not interested in buying the goods considered in your research).

Set aside the issues related to extreme observations, I would not advise ttest anyway, as you seem to have 3 groups of observations. Hence, you would be probably better with ANOVA and subsequent multiple comparisons.

Moreover, as far as your zero-spenders are concerned, I would try to understand how many of them are systematic zeros (that is, people who cannot afford to spend money because they cannot rely upon a disposable income) vs sample zeros (that is, people who are not interested in buying the goods considered in your research).

Set aside the theoretical issues related to extreme observations, I would not advise ttest anyway, as you seem to have 3 groups of observations. Hence, you would be probably better with ANOVA and subsequent multiple comparisons.

Moreover, as far as your zero-spenders are concerned, I would try to understand how many of them are systematic zeros (that is, people who cannot afford to spend money because they cannot rely upon a disposable income) vs sample zeros (that is, people who are not interested in buying the goods considered in your research).

added 22 characters in body
Source Link

Set aside the issues related to extreme observations, I would not advise ttest anyway, as you seem to have 3 groups of observations. Hence, you would be probably better with ANOVA and subsequent multiple comparisons.

Moreover, as far as your zero-spenders are concerned, I would try to understand how many of them are systematic zeros (that is, people who cannot afford to spend money because they cannot rely upon a disposable income) vs sample zeros (that is, people who are not interested in buying the goods considered in your research).

Set aside extreme observations, I would not advise ttest anyway, as you seem to have 3 groups of observations. Hence, you would be probably better with ANOVA and subsequent multiple comparisons.

Moreover, as far as your zero-spenders are concerned, I would try to understand how many of them are systematic zeros (that is, people who cannot afford to spend money because they cannot rely upon a disposable income) vs sample zeros (that is, people who are not interested in buying the goods considered in your research).

Set aside the issues related to extreme observations, I would not advise ttest anyway, as you seem to have 3 groups of observations. Hence, you would be probably better with ANOVA and subsequent multiple comparisons.

Moreover, as far as your zero-spenders are concerned, I would try to understand how many of them are systematic zeros (that is, people who cannot afford to spend money because they cannot rely upon a disposable income) vs sample zeros (that is, people who are not interested in buying the goods considered in your research).

Source Link

Set aside extreme observations, I would not advise ttest anyway, as you seem to have 3 groups of observations. Hence, you would be probably better with ANOVA and subsequent multiple comparisons.

Moreover, as far as your zero-spenders are concerned, I would try to understand how many of them are systematic zeros (that is, people who cannot afford to spend money because they cannot rely upon a disposable income) vs sample zeros (that is, people who are not interested in buying the goods considered in your research).