Timeline for Naive SE vs Time Series SE: which statistics should I report after Bayesian estimation?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2019 at 14:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Apr 17, 2019 at 16:30 | answer | added | Rufo | timeline score: 7 | |
| Nov 3, 2013 at 12:00 | history | edited | Nick Cox | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 15 characters in body; edited title
|
| Nov 3, 2013 at 11:48 | comment | added | Adam Ryczkowski | OK. I never used r2jags. | |
| Nov 3, 2013 at 10:52 | comment | added | HelloL | I run JAGS in R via r2jags.You can check the statistics with the following R code: "jags.mcmc<-as.mcmc(jags.estimation); jags.sum<-summary(jags.mcmc); jags.sum.stat<-jags.sum$statistics". Here is an example where both Naive SE and Time Series SE are reported by JAGS: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/71731/… | |
| Nov 3, 2013 at 9:42 | comment | added | Adam Ryczkowski | Where exactly did you find those statistics? I use JAGS too, but never ever seen JAGS reporting something like this on its own. Maybe it is not JAGS, but some model you use. In this case you should include the model into the question. | |
| Nov 3, 2013 at 7:09 | history | asked | HelloL | CC BY-SA 3.0 |