Timeline for Calibration of weights for market research survey
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2016 at 14:53 | history | edited | StasK |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 27, 2013 at 5:41 | vote | accept | Analyst | ||
| Nov 26, 2013 at 16:39 | answer | added | StasK | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 26, 2013 at 14:28 | comment | added | StasK | I think both are too mathematical. Unfortunately, there is really no middle ground between say Cochran (or even Lohr), on one hand, and the "softer" methodology on survey methodology. You can look at what other people are doing in the grey literature of method reports -- if you want a serious smack on your head with tons of details, you can read the one from California Health Interview Survey. | |
| Nov 26, 2013 at 14:22 | comment | added | Analyst | Thanks StasK for links. I have consulted Cochran's classic and Särndal et al, but did not find exact solutions.. | |
| Nov 26, 2013 at 14:08 | comment | added | StasK | Non-response, the ways to diagnoze and overcome it have been THE main topic in public opinion research in the past 20 years or so. The most cited article has 850+ citations at this point, there is a number of books on it, etc. I believe Lohr's book must have a few sections on this. | |
| Nov 26, 2013 at 14:03 | history | edited | StasK |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 26, 2013 at 10:10 | history | asked | Analyst | CC BY-SA 3.0 |