Timeline for How to measure association of nominal values for few observations?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2014 at 13:44 | answer | added | tomka | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 4, 2014 at 12:59 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackStats/status/419452989930496000 | ||
| S Jan 4, 2014 at 12:12 | history | suggested | Nick Stauner | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added nominal, categorical-data, and r tags; added acute accent mark in "Cramér."
|
| Jan 4, 2014 at 11:58 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 4, 2014 at 12:12 | |||||
| Jan 4, 2014 at 11:33 | comment | added | rumtscho | @ttnphns I want to measure the strength of the association. I was afraid that the warning may mean that a measure calculated for my sample can be very far off from the true measure for the whole population. | |
| Jan 4, 2014 at 11:27 | comment | added | ttnphns |
Is your question about significance testing or about strength-of-association measure? "Chi-squared approximation may be incorrect" is about approximation by chi-square distribution for reasons of significance testing, not about Cramer's coefficient itself.
|
|
| Jan 4, 2014 at 10:07 | history | asked | rumtscho | CC BY-SA 3.0 |