The likelihood function of a lognormal distribution is:
$$f(x; \mu, \sigma) \propto \prod_{i_1}^n \frac{1}{\sigma x_i} \exp \left ( - \frac{(\ln{x_i} - \mu)^2}{2 \sigma^2} \right ) $$
and Jeffreys's Prior is:
$$p(\mu,\sigma) \propto \frac{1}{\sigma^2} $$
so combining the two gives:
$$f(\mu,\sigma^2|x)= \prod_{i_1}^n \frac{1}{\sigma x_i} \exp \left ( - \frac{(\ln{x_i} - \mu)^2}{2 \sigma^2} \right ) \cdot \sigma^{-2} $$
I know that the posterior density for $\sigma^2$ is inverse Gamma distributed, so I have to calculate
$$f(\sigma^2|x) = \int f(\mu,\sigma^2|x)~\mathrm d\mu $$
but I have no clue where to start here.
After Glen_b's comment I give it a shot:
\begin{align}f(\mu,\sigma^2|x)&= \prod_{i_1}^n \frac{1}{\sigma x_i} \exp \left ( - \frac{(\ln{x_i} - \mu)^2}{2 \sigma^2} \right ) \cdot \sigma^{-2} \\&= \sigma^{-n-2} \prod_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{x_i} \exp \left ( - \frac{1}{2\sigma^2} \sum_{i=1}^n (\ln x_i - \mu ) \right) \end{align}
but I cannot see this going anywhere.
Another idea I got is to define $y_i=\ln(x_i)$, then $y$ is normal distributed. So
\begin{align}f(\mu,\sigma^2 |y) &= \left [ \prod_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \cdot \frac{1}{\sigma} \exp \left ( - \frac{1}{2 \sigma^2} (y_i - \mu)^2 \right ) \right ] \cdot \frac{1}{\sigma^2}\\& \propto \sigma^{-n-2} \cdot \exp \left ( - \frac{1}{2 \sigma^2} \sum_{i=1}^n (y_i - \bar y)^2 + n(\bar y - \mu)^2 \right ) \\& = \sigma^{-n-2} \cdot \exp \left ( - \frac{1}{2 \sigma^2} ( (n-1)s^2 + n(\bar y - \mu)^2 ) \right ) \\&= \sigma^{-n-2} \cdot \exp \left ( - \frac{1}{2 \sigma^2} ( (n-1)s^2 \right ) \exp \left (n(\bar y - \mu)^2 ) \right ) \end{align}
then integrate
$$ \sigma^{-n-2} \cdot \exp \left ( - \frac{1}{2 \sigma^2} ( (n-1)s^2 \right ) \int \exp \left ( - \frac{1}{2 \sigma^2} n(\bar y - \mu)^2 ) \right ) ~\mathrm d \mu; $$
by the method you suggested, I get:
$$ \int \exp \left ( - \frac{1}{2 \sigma^2} n(\bar y - \mu)^2 ) \right ) ~\mathrm d \mu = \sqrt{\frac{2\pi \sigma^2}{n}} $$
So:
$$ \propto (\sigma^2)^{-(n+1)/2} \exp \left ( - \frac{1}{2 \sigma^2} ( (n-1)s^2 \right ) $$
which is indeed inverse Gamma distributed.
But I am unsure if this is correct, it's also the same result as I get for a normal likelihood.
I found this in the literature (without any further explanantion):