4
$\begingroup$

Let $ X_1, ... , X_n $ be i.i.d random variables with pdf given by

$$f(x;\theta) = \exp(-(x-\theta))I_{(\theta, \infty)}(x)$$

It is asked to find a sufficient statistics for $ \theta $ and to verify if it is complete too. Since

$$L(\theta;x)=\exp(-\sum x_i) \exp(n\theta) I_{(\theta, \infty)}(x_{(1)}),$$

by the factorization theorem, $X_{(1)} $ is sufficient. But I could not prove (or disprove) that it is complete, using the definition. Is there another way of doing it? Or how we show it, by the definition?

Thanks!

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You've posted quite a few self-study questions already - please add the tag each time. What definition of completeness do you have? $\endgroup$
    – Glen_b
    Commented Sep 22, 2014 at 0:25
  • $\begingroup$ In this case, with the definition here, it seems to be reasonably straightforward. $\endgroup$
    – Glen_b
    Commented Sep 22, 2014 at 0:33
  • $\begingroup$ stats.stackexchange.com/q/427247/119261 $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 29, 2020 at 15:18

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

By the definition the pag. 42 the book Theory of Point Estimation - Lehmann and Casella, say T is said that it is complete if $E_{\theta}[f(T)]=0$ for all $\theta \in \Omega$ implies $f(t)=0\, (a.e \,\mathcal{P})$.

Well, $P(X_{(1)} \leq x) = P(min\{X_1,\ldots,X_n \} \leq x)=1 - P(min\{X_1,\ldots,X_n \} > x) = 1 - P(X_1>x) \ldots P(X_n>x) = 1 - [P(X_1>x)]^n = 1 - [1 - P(X_1<x)]^n = 1 - [1 - F_{X_1}(x)]^n.$

Then $F_{X_1}(x) = 1 - [1 - F_{X_1}(x)]^n \Rightarrow f_{X_{(1)}}=n[1 - F_{X_1}(x)]^{n-1}f_{X_1}(x).$

$E_{\theta}[g(T)]=0 \Rightarrow \int_{\theta}^{\infty}g(t)exp(-(t-\theta))dt = 0$ then $\frac{\partial }{\partial \theta}\int_{\theta}^{\infty}g(t)exp(-(t-\theta))dt = 0$ then $g(\theta)=0$ for all $\theta \in \Omega=R^{+}$.

In conclusion $T(\textbf{X})=X_{(1)}\, (a.e \,\mathcal{P})$ is a sufficient statistics and complete.

I hope to have answered your question.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ But you didn't use $f_{X_{(1)}}$ anywhere why did u calculate it ? $\endgroup$
    – Daman
    Commented Oct 27, 2018 at 8:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.