2
$\begingroup$

Problem description

If a population proportion is 0.28, and if the sample size is 140, 30% of the time the sample proportion will be less than what value if you are taking random samples?

This is a sample proportion problem for a binomial sample distribution. Sample distributions tends to become normally distributed when enough samples are taken.

$ p = 0.28 $

$ n = 140 $

$ P \ (\hat{p} < x) = 30 \% $

My reasoning has been to find the $z$-score for the left part of the normal curve, up to the proportion value $ P = 30 \% $. According to a $ z $-score table, the $ z $-value for $ 0.2995 $ is $z = -0.84$.

Using the z-score formula for sample proportions:

$$ z = \frac{\hat{p}-p}{\sqrt{\frac{p*q}{n}}} = -0.84 = \frac{\hat{p}-0.28}{\sqrt{\frac{0.28*(1-0.28)}{140}}}$$

We solve the equation for $ \hat{p} $, which should give $ \hat{p} = 0.24 $.

However, my solution sheet says the correct answer should be $ 0.26 $.

Have I solved the problem incorrectly in identifying $ \hat{p} = 0.24 $?

I realize that we are actually looking for the value of $ x $, however I'm not sure if my logic is correct to assume that $ x = \hat{p} $ for these limit values.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Because this distribution is not Normal--it is Binomial--the answers you are getting could be misleading in some applications. The crucial idea is that the Binomial distribution is discrete. That matters, because there are only a small number of proportions you are likely to see. Thus, $24.54\%$ of the time the sample proportion will be $35/140=0.25$ or less and $30.93\%$ of the time the proportion will be $36/140=0.257$ or less. That's an appreciable gap in proportions--and neither is exactly $30\%$. $\endgroup$
    – whuber
    Commented Jul 24, 2016 at 16:37

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

It looks like you made an error looking at the $z$-score table. The $z$-value for .30 is around -.525. Using that you will get the right answer.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, you made a mistake there. I am guessing the table you saw was the one here on the bottom of the page. This table only gives the area from 0 to a positive number. So you cannot use that to find quantile values. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 24, 2016 at 16:21
  • $\begingroup$ Oh I see, I looked for the z-score value for 0.3, when I should've been looking for 0.5-0.3 = 0.2, for the proportion under the limit on the cumulative z-score table. Thanks! $\endgroup$
    – P A N
    Commented Jul 24, 2016 at 16:21
0
$\begingroup$

I got a result of 0.26 when I did the calculation you suggest (which appears to be correct). It may have been a calculation/rounding error on your part?

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.