7
$\begingroup$

(This is possibly a silly question, but I am curious.)

The multivariate Gaussian PDF is typically written something like this

$$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{(2\pi)^{d}\lvert \boldsymbol\Sigma\rvert}} \exp\left(-\frac{1}{2}({\mathbf x}-{\boldsymbol\mu})^\mathrm{T}{\boldsymbol\Sigma}^{-1}({\mathbf x}-{\boldsymbol\mu}) \right) $$

where $d$ is the dimension of $\mathbf x$ (e.g. the above was taken from Wikipedia).

However it seems to me that the normalization factor could equivalently be written as $\sqrt{|2\pi\boldsymbol\Sigma|}$, letting the determinant take care of the implicit $d$ exponent. Moreover, this is simpler to write and gives a dimension-independent formula.

Is this an acceptable alternative notation?

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Indeed the formula $$|2πΣ|=(2π)^d|Σ|$$ is correct.

In practice, one would compute $|Σ|$ and then multiply it by $(2π)^d$, rather than multiply $Σ$ by $2π$, which involves $d^2$ operations, and then compute its determinant.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.