The condition of symmetry is not required here. If you have known mean $\mu = 0$ then, following the working you used (but with standard notation), you get:
$$\begin{equation} \begin{aligned}
\mathbb{E}(S_\mu^2)
= \mathbb{E}\Big( \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n X_i^2 \Big)
&= \mathbb{E}\Big( \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n (X_i - \mu)^2 \Big) \\[6pt]
&= \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n \mathbb{E}\Big((X_i - \mu)^2 \Big) \\[6pt]
&= \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n \mathbb{V}(X_i) \\[6pt]
&= \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n \sigma^2 \\[6pt]
&= \frac{1}{n} \cdot n \sigma^2 = \sigma^2. \\[6pt]
\end{aligned} \end{equation}$$
The above working is perfectly valid in the case where the random variables are correlated. (We can still write the expectation of the sum as the sum of the expectations, etc.) This is because the true mean is assumed known in this case, so correlation between the observable values has no effect on the expected value of the estimator. That means that this estimator is an unbiased estimator of the variance, for the case where $\mu = 0$, regardless of the correlation between the observable variables.
It is important to bear in mind that correlation between the values affects the variance of the estimator, and so confidence intervals are affected. There are other questions on this site that look at adjustments to the effective sample size (and consequent standard error of the estimator) for autocorrelation (see e.g., here). Roughly speaking, negative autocorrelation induces higher sample variance (relative to the true variance) in the series and positive autocorrelation induces lower sample variance (relative to the true variance). This necessitates adjustments to the standard error estimator, which can be calculated by deriving the variance of the estimator.