4
$\begingroup$

From this thread, a new question arose.

Given $(\Omega, \mathscr{F}, P)$ and a constant $c$, what's $E[X|X=c]$ and why?

I believe they suggested that $E[X|X=c]=c.$

I have however that for $B\in \mathscr{F},$

$$E(X|B)=\frac{E(X1_B)}{P(B)}.$$

If the distribution function of $X$ is continuous, $P(B)=P({X=x})=0!$

Actually, not sure about this since $P$ isn't a distribution function, but a measure. This article states:

When $P(H)=0$ (for instance if $Y$ is a [[continuous random variable]] and H is the event $Y=y$, this is in general the case), the [[Borel–Kolmogorov paradox]] demonstrates the ambiguity of attempting to define the conditional probability knowing the event $H$. The above formula shows that this problem transposes to the conditional expectation. So instead one only defines the conditional expectation with respect to a σ-algebra or a random variable.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

7
$\begingroup$

Short answer : It depends on how to define $\mathbb{E}[X | X = c]$.

Longer answer : As you cited, the conditional expectation is defined with respect to a $\sigma$-algebra not to an event. In fact, the conditional expectation is a class of random variables. Therefore the answer can depend on the choice of the element in the conditional expectation class.

If we define $\mathbb{E}[X | X = c]$ as $\mathbb{E}[X | \sigma(X)](\omega)$ for $\omega$ satisfying $X(\omega) = c$, and if we use the $X$ as a verion of $\mathbb{E}[X | \sigma(X)]$ then $\mathbb{E}[X | X = c] := \mathbb{E}[X | \sigma(X)](\omega) := X(\omega) := c$.

However, if the event $C := \{\omega : X(\omega) = c\}$ is a measure zero set then we can define $Z$ such that $Z(\omega) = X(\omega),~~\forall \omega \notin C$ and $Z(\omega) = c' \neq c,~~\forall \omega \in C$. Then, $Z$ is also a version of $\mathbb{E}[X | \sigma(X)]$. Therefore, in this case, $\mathbb{E}[X | X = c] := \mathbb{E}[X | \sigma(X)](\omega) := Z(\omega) := c' \neq c$.

This example shows that $\mathbb{E}[X | Y = c]$ is not well-defined in general. However, in many cases, there exists a canonical representer of a conditional expectation. In this case, we can define $\mathbb{E}[X | Y = c]$ with respect to the canonical representer.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.