2
$\begingroup$

I am running a panel data regression. First, I did a pooled OLS regression. Then I did a random effects (re) one. I carried out the Hausman test, and it refuted the null hypothesis (ie. I am discouraged to use random effects over fixed effects). So, I did the following:

(1) I carried out a Hausman-Taylor regression (in Stata, xthtaylor). Using xtoverid, I got that this model is OK when compared with the fixed effects one. However, this model displays no $\text{R}^2$ value. Furthermore, I was told that Hausman-Taylor is not a good model to use when you goal is to use the model to estimate outcomes.

I am trying to find out about the minimum distance estimator. It should be a procedure that allows me to combine fixed effects with time invariant regressors. Is there a Stata command for that? Do you know any reference on this topic?

Any suggestion on how to deal with my current problem is very welcome!

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ What about Fixed-effects Vector Decomposition? There seems to be a lot of controversy on this method, however. $\endgroup$
    – JJ O
    Commented Nov 7, 2012 at 15:57

2 Answers 2

5
$\begingroup$

The following not-yet-published paper is, in my opinion, an excellent introduction and answer to the problem you bring up:

http://polmeth.wustl.edu/media/Paper/FixedversusRandom_1_2.pdf

To summarize, you can still proceed with the random effects approach, but you must first modify the model to account for the fact that the within-cluster and between-cluster effects differ (i.e., what the Hausman test indicates). You can do this by adding the cluster means of your predictor as a separate predictor in the model, and then optionally also applying within-cluster centering to the original predictor. The details of this procedure and the resulting interpretations are discussed at some length in the paper linked above.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Did you check for cross sectional independence?If you reject the cross sectional independence, you need to use the robust hausman test, not the usual hausman. See, here

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.