I am struggling with understanding what is the correct statistical method to use to determine the statistical difference in proportions for multiple experiments. Let me explain my scenario.
I have run 3 advertisement experiments on 3 different days (which is represented by 3 experiments below. Please assume apart from sample size every other characteristics are same across each day such as gender, user profile etc.).
Experiment 1
Clicked on Ad | Did not click on Ad | |
---|---|---|
Control | 100 | 900 |
Test | 12 | 88 |
Experiment 2
Clicked on Ad | Did not click on Ad | |
---|---|---|
Control | 45 | 500 |
Test | 14 | 80 |
Experiment 3
Clicked on Ad | Did not click on Ad | |
---|---|---|
Control | 250 | 1500 |
Test | 100 | 900 |
The proportion I am interested in is click through rate (CTR). CTR = number of users who clicked on ad/total number of users who saw the ad. For example, for experiment 1 for control group the CTR = 100/(100+900) = 0.1 or 10%. So I want to know if my test variant has better (statistically significant) CTR than my control variant or not?
So there are two approaches I can think of test statistical significance,
For each experiment (or day) determine CTR's for both control and tests. So now I have 3 different values of CTRs for controls and tests. Calculate means of the CTRs of both groups and run t-test to determine difference in means.
Sum all the controls and tests group across experiments to create one contigency table and than run a chi-squared test on them to determine difference in proportions.
I dont know if either one of this approach is correct or is there an another approach which is correct.
Again, my goal is to know if my test variant has statistically different CTR than my control variant?
Thank you for the help,