3
$\begingroup$

I am reading the documentation of boot::abc.ci and feel I am missing something. It sounds like the "ABC" method is just an approximation of BCa bootstrap confidence intervals.

Is this the case? If so, when would we want to use that approximation instead of calculating the full BCa confidence interval? (The boot package calculates BCa intervals.)

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Basically, there are situations where BCa intervals can become quite computationally expensive and ABC intervals offer a feasible alternative. With the computational power usually at hands nowadays, I don't think there is so much need for ABC intervals anymore, though. $\endgroup$
    – LuckyPal
    Commented Sep 20, 2021 at 12:59
  • $\begingroup$ @LuckyPal That confirms my suspicion. Want to post that as an answer? $\endgroup$
    – Dave
    Commented Sep 20, 2021 at 13:35

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

Basically, there are situations where BCa intervals can become quite computationally expensive and ABC intervals offer a more feasible alternative. With the computational power usually at hands nowadays, I don't think there is so much need for ABC intervals anymore, though.

As reference, there is a brief statement about ABC methods in Puth et al. (2015):

[ABC methods] were developed as approximations to the BCa method that require much less computational effort. Increasing availability of computing power reduces concerns about computational effort [...] Further details of these methods can be found in Efron & Tibshirani (1993) or Manly (2007).

Puth, M. T., Neuhäuser, M., & Ruxton, G. D. (2015). On the variety of methods for calculating confidence intervals by bootstrapping. Journal of Animal Ecology, 84(4), 892-897. Link.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.