0
$\begingroup$

I have the following model for returns as a function of firm_profitability, sentiment, and additional predictors (included in the Gamma * Z term), with error term e.

positive_sentiment is a dummy variable representing sentiment > 0, so that the association between returns and sentiment can differ between positive and negative sentiment values.

returns = -0.23 + 0.91 firm_profitability + 
          0.32 sentiment  +
          0.52 (positive_sentiment * sentiment) +
          0.66 (sentiment * firm_profitability) +
          Gamma * Z + 
          e

Can someone please help me interpret the equation using the partial derivative with respect to sentiment? Can we interpret it as 1 unit increase in negative sentiment increases returns by 0.32, and when we interact sentiment with the positive sentiment dummy, the total impact of positive sentiment on returns is 0.84 (= 0.32 + 0.52)?

I also would like to find the inflection point where the effect of firm profitability changes direction based on the effect of sentiment interaction, as I see the negative and positive sentiments affect returns differently.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Please clarify your specific problem or provide additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it's hard to tell exactly what you're asking. $\endgroup$
    – Community Bot
    Commented Aug 17, 2022 at 1:23
  • $\begingroup$ I just want to intrepret this regression by interms of positive sentiment and by effect of firm size on returns...i mean how returns are influenced by positive sentiment and firmsize , sentiment negative sentiment;;want to explain while gamma represents control variable $\endgroup$
    – adarshad
    Commented Aug 17, 2022 at 4:36
  • $\begingroup$ It's not clear how sentiment differs from positive_sentiment. Is sentiment a continuous variable that can be either positive or negative, while positive_sentiment is a dummy that is 0 for negative sentiment and 1 for positive sentiment? If so, what were you trying to accomplish with the positive_sentiment * sentiment interaction term? $\endgroup$
    – EdM
    Commented Aug 19, 2022 at 20:13
  • $\begingroup$ Sir the positive sentiment *sentiment is actually a variable that has only has positive values of sentiment. So as this helps me to turn a simple 0 or 1 dummy variables into a dummy variable carrying positive values and actually depicting positive sentiment while negative sentiment is treated as zero, effectively portraying effect of positive and negative sentiment differently. My query is to find inflection point where effect of firm profitability changes direction based on effect of sentiment interaction., as I see the negative and positive sentiment effect returns differently. $\endgroup$
    – adarshad
    Commented Aug 19, 2022 at 23:17

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

Can we interpret [the coefficient for sentiment] as 1 unit increase in negative sentiment increases returns by 0.32?

Only if firm_profitability = 0, as you have an interaction between sentiment and firm_profitability that isn't restricted to positive values of sentiment. Within negative values of sentiment, a 1-unit change in sentiment means a change of 0.32+0.66*firm_profitability in returns.

when we interact sentiment with the positive sentiment dummy, the total impact of positive sentiment on returns is 0.84 (= 0.32 + 0.52)?

Again, only if firm_profitability = 0 as that otherwise would still ignore the interaction term 0.66 (sentiment * firm_profitability). You need to take the firm_profitability into account. When a predictor is involved in an interaction, is has no single association with outcome unless you specify the values of all its interacting predictors.

I also would like to find the inflection point where the effect of firm profitability changes direction based on the effect of sentiment interaction.

I take this to mean that you are looking for the level of sentiment at which the association between returns and increasing firm_profitability changes from negative to positive. The first derivative of returns with respect to firm_profitability is a function of sentiment: 0.91 + 0.66*sentiment. This equals 0 when sentiment = -0.91/0.66, approximately -1.38. Note that this is below the value of 0 at which you allowed for a change in the association between returns and sentiment.

In response to comment

You can ask a related question: what's the level of firm_profitability where the association between sentiment and returns changes sign? In your model, that depends on whether sentiment is negative or positive.

For positive sentiment, the first derivative of returns with respect to sentiment is: 0.32 + 0.52 + 0.66*firm_profitability. That equals 0 (sign of association switches) at approximately firm_profitability = -1.27.

For negative sentiment, the first derivative of returns with respect to sentiment is: 0.32 + 0.66*firm_profitability. That equals 0 at approximately firm_profitability = -0.49.

Whether those predictions make sense depends on your understanding of the subject matter.

Specifying a sharp change in one part of the model at sentiment = 0 while having the interaction between sentiment and firm_profitability independent of the sign of sentiment might be leading to predictions that don't represent reality well. You might consider a model that handles sentiment more smoothly, for example with regression splines, instead.

$\endgroup$
8
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. You got ii. I also want the level of profitability at which sentiment changes from positive to negative or vice versa. I cannot comprehend the last line from note that; please can you explain it as I have many firms with different equations results. $\endgroup$
    – adarshad
    Commented Aug 24, 2022 at 5:11
  • $\begingroup$ secondly, if the interaction term is significant, then can we interpret sentiment as negative sentiment ? I mean if the interaction term is significant, then we can interpret that negative sentiment= sentiment $\endgroup$
    – adarshad
    Commented Aug 24, 2022 at 5:18
  • $\begingroup$ one more query, for calculating inflection point, does we require both the values of 0.91 + 0.66*sentiment =-1.38 as significant or significance does not matter. can you throw light from point of view of significance. I really appreciate your valuable contribution $\endgroup$
    – adarshad
    Commented Aug 25, 2022 at 11:25
  • $\begingroup$ @adarshad the point estimate of the "inflection point" won't change based on "statistical significance" considerations. You might determine confidence intervals based on the covariance matrix of the coefficient estimates and the formula for variance of a weighted sum of random variables. The linearHypothesis() function in the R car package can help with that. The practical significance depends on your knowledge of the subject matter. $\endgroup$
    – EdM
    Commented Aug 25, 2022 at 13:12
  • $\begingroup$ what are your comments for below the allowed value of zero.Can you explain this? $\endgroup$
    – adarshad
    Commented Sep 1, 2022 at 15:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.