4
$\begingroup$

Suppose that the observations $(y_t, x_t, k_t)_{t=1}^N$ satisfy the linear regression equation:

\begin{equation} \begin{split} y_t = \begin{cases} x_t \beta + e_t & w.p. \; \theta \\ k_t \gamma + e_t & w.p. \; 1-\theta \end{cases} \end{split} \end{equation} with $\mathbb{E}(e_t|x_t, k_t)=0$ and other usual assumptions.

Can I estimate $\beta*\theta$ and $\gamma*(1-\theta)$?

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ What does "w.p." mean?? Are the apparent error terms "$e_t$" the same quantities in both cases or not? $\endgroup$
    – whuber
    Commented Sep 1, 2022 at 17:49
  • $\begingroup$ w.p. is standard notation for 'with probability,' it denotes a random variable. Not sure how the error term being the same is relevant, the error term is defined as the difference between $y_t$ and the conditional mean. Thanks. $\endgroup$
    – Luca Gi
    Commented Sep 1, 2022 at 19:14
  • $\begingroup$ It wouldn't make sense for $\theta$ to be a random variable. Would you mean that there is a lurking random Bernoulli$(\theta)$ variable independent of $e_t$ and that $y_t = kx_t\beta + e_t$ conditional on $U=1$ and otherwise $y_t = k_t\gamma + e_t$ when $U=0$? $\endgroup$
    – whuber
    Commented Sep 1, 2022 at 20:17
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, that's what I mean. Thanks. $\endgroup$
    – Luca Gi
    Commented Sep 1, 2022 at 20:19

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

The conditional mean of $y_t$ is $\mathbb{E}(y_t|x_t, k_t) = x_t \beta \theta + k_t \gamma (1-\theta)$, so parameters can be identified with the regression $$y_t = a_1 x_t + a_2 k_t + e_t$$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.