4
$\begingroup$

I have a question that must be common, but after searching, I can't find an explanation. Suppose we wish to estimate the percentage of people, p, who have a disease. We test n people. The test has known true-positive and a false-positive rates of TP and FP. The expected number positive tests is $E[Y]=TPp+FP(1-p)$. Solving for p, the estimate of p is $$p = \frac{(y/n)-FP}{TP-FP}$$ How do we calculate the error in the estimate of p? There is uncertainty/error from the sampling of the population (binomial distribution of with n samples and probability p) and additional uncertainty/error from the test's true-positives and false-positive rates, which are also binomial distributions.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Could you clarify if $TP,FP$ are to be treated as known or unknown? You state them as known, but are concerned with the uncertainty in them later. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 28 at 14:24
  • $\begingroup$ @user1848065 I think OP meant that any single patient not only undergoes a Bernoulli trial to determine their healthy/sick status, but also a second trial to determine whether their test flags positive, which depends on TP and FP. I don't think OP meant that the TP and FP values themselves have uncertainty $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 28 at 23:07

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

Let $T$=TP and $F$=FP, which are known and constant. Also assume $T\neq F$.

Taking a step back, let $Y_i$ be an independent binary variable corresponding to a single patient's test result. We have \begin{align*} P(Y_i=1)&=Tp+F(1-p)=F+(T-F)p\\ P(Y_i=0)&=1-F-(T-F)p\\ \end{align*} The variance (as $Y_i$ is a Bernoulli variable) is thus $$Var(Y_i)=\Big(F+(T-F)p\Big)\Big(1-F-(T-F)p\Big)$$

Now, turning our attention to $\hat{p}$, the estimator for $p$. As you say, it is: \begin{align*} \hat{p}&=\frac{y-F}{T-F} \end{align*}

where we defined $y:=\frac{1}{N}\sum_i^N Y_i$, which is the overall percentage of positive test results. The variance of $\hat{p}$ is

\begin{align*} Var(\hat{p})&=\frac{\sum_i^N Var(Y_i)}{N^2(T-F)^2}\\ &= \frac{Var(Y_i)}{N(T-F)^2}\\ &= \frac{\Big(F+(T-F)p\Big)\Big(1-F-(T-F)p\Big)}{N(T-F)^2} \end{align*}

The standard error is the square root of the above, while substituting in our estimate $\hat{p}$:

\begin{align*} SE(\hat{p})&=\sqrt{\frac{\Big(F+(T-F)\hat{p}\Big)\Big(1-F-(T-F)\hat{p}\Big)}{N(T-F)^2}}\\ &=\sqrt{\frac{y(1-y)}{N(T-F)^2}} \end{align*}

This expression is consistent with our intuition that the standard error is small (ie. high certainty in our estimation of the prevalence $p$) when $N$ is large, $T$ is large or $F$ is small.


Footnote: what if $T=F$? Intuitively, this means the test is worthless; sick and healthy patients are just as likely to test positive, meaning the test is completely uncorrelated to the disease process. Hence there's no point trying to estimate $p$ from such a test.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, cambridgecircus for you clear and most helpful answer, which has helped me learn. $\endgroup$
    – Gary S
    Commented Jan 30 at 18:46
  • $\begingroup$ The comments on the original post raise an interesting question. Suppose $T$ and $F$ as random variables with known probabilities, such as $T=p(Y=1|X=1)$, where $X$ is the patient's true state, disease or not. The $Var(Y_i)$ is the variance of the sum of two (negatively) correlated terms: $Tp$ and $F(1-p)$. The algebra simplifies nicely. However, can we treat $T$ and $F$ as random variables when addressing the variance of $Y_i$ but treat them as parameters elsewhere in the equation for $\hat{p}$? $\endgroup$
    – Gary S
    Commented Jan 30 at 19:00
  • $\begingroup$ @GaryS no worries, if this answer has helped, please mark it as answered. Regarding your follow-on comment, yes it's possible to have $T$ and $F$ as RVs themselves. However I'm not too sure what yo mean by $Tp$ and $F(1-p)$ being negatively correlated, and the algebra simplyfing. Also I'm not sure what you mean by treating $T$,$F$ as RVs but parameters elsewhere; the point is that $\hat{p}$ will be a compound probability distribution parameterised by $T$ and $F$, which are RVs themselves. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 31 at 14:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.