6
$\begingroup$

I'm investigating optimal bidding in auctions, and am using logistic regression to predict the probability of winning an auction given a set of explanatory variables (e.g. the price I bid, number of competing bids etc).

One explanatory variable I want to use is the second highest price that was paid. However, by the design of the auction, I only observe the second highest price paid when I am the highest bidder (i.e. when I win the auction).

This missing data is a major issue as my dataset indicates that there is a winning bid only ~20% of the time, hence I don't know the second highest price paid 80% of the time. Yet intuitively, I don't want to drop this variable as it seems to me knowledge of the second highest bid is extremely valuable in determining my chances of being the winning bid.

Thus are there any standard methods to cope with this kind of missing data for logistic regression?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This sounds to me more like a missing data problem than a censoring problem. $\endgroup$ – Peter Flom - Reinstate Monica Jul 21 '14 at 10:38
  • $\begingroup$ @PeterFlom updated post to reflect your comment $\endgroup$ – mchen Jul 21 '14 at 10:40
  • $\begingroup$ This is definitely a censoring situation. Considering it as such is more fruitful than treating it as missing data because the mechanism of the censoring is clear and leads directly to useful likelihood-based models and estimation. (cc @Peter) $\endgroup$ – whuber Jul 21 '14 at 13:53
2
$\begingroup$

I am afraid you cannot expect to find some "canned" solution to your problem. Most methods for handling missing data assumes "missing at random" or even "missing completely at random" (you can google those terms!). Your problem seems definitely to be a problem of informative missingness. Then you will need to model the mechanism of missingness, and maybe model the "second highest bid" as a response, given some covariables (which might include the winning bid).

From there you can try to build a custom model. You can google for "informative missingness" to get some ideas.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

@Kjetil gave a good answer.

One possible simple alternative, if you have enough auctions, is to run two models: One with the data that has both highest and second highest and one that has just the highest.

An advantage of this approach would be that each model will be considerably simpler than a full model with both. But a disadvantage is that you won't be able to use the 2nd highest bid at all unless you actually have it.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.