2
$\begingroup$

After trying several models with my data, R^2 and p values are showing my model looks like below. ACF plot tells me AR term is significant. Insights into data tells me change in 'x' would have impact(say y is A/C usage and x is temperature).

  y(t)=a+b*y(t-1)+c*{x(t)-x(t-1)}+error

Question: Is the above model statistically meaningful? If so, what is the category of this "linear model" called? I came across AR models, MA models and ARIMA/ARMA models, but havent seen a model where AR term and diff(independent variable) exists together.

|cite|improve this question
$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

I think your model still falls within the category of Multiple Regression Analysis. Such models can include autoregressive variables as you depict. Translating your model in plain English you have: Energy consumption is a function of Energy consumption in the previous period and the change in temperature.

Depending on how your dependent variable is structured, your model could have a Unit-Root issue. This means that your dependent variable is nonstationary, and is not mean-reverting. In such a case, both the Variance and the Average of (a smaller section of the time series) of the dependent variable can drift in the same direction for too long. If this is the case, your dependent variable is mispecified. And, your model's results are spurious even if the overall R Square is very high and the variables are very statistically significant (this is a very common result with mispecified models).

I think if your variable is Energy consumption for a specific geographical area, you may run into such a Unit-Root situation. As, Energy consumption goes up forever. If your variable is Energy consumption per capita, maybe it is fine as is.

Investigating whether your model has a Unit-Root issue or not, may dictate whether your results are statistically meaningful or not. If it does have a Unit-Root, you need to transform the dependent variable. If you transform it to represent the % change in Energy consumption per capita, you will most probably avoid any Unit-Root issue.

|cite|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ kashili khashili, given that you have given me best answer, as a matter of consistency can you also give me a helpful vote. Thanks. $\endgroup$ – Sympa Feb 23 '15 at 22:52
0
$\begingroup$

In addition to @Gaetan's comments above, good discussion can be found at How to interpret augmented Dickey-Fuller unit root test in R , Multiple linear regression for hypothesis testing , Is $R^2$ useful or dangerous?

|cite|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Those are all interesting topics. The way I interpret either the Dickey-Fuller or the Augmented Dickey-Fuller is that their t statistic (called tau statistic) should be very statistically significant with a negative sign. This indicates that the dependent variable is indeed mean reverting. Regarding whether R Square is useful or dangerous... well it can be very useful. It can also be very dangerous. I remember reading a book on econometrics recently, and the author/professor stated if he sees any econometrics model with an R Square of 0.95 or above... it is very likely mispecified. $\endgroup$ – Sympa Aug 16 '14 at 21:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.