I have some data that I strongly suspect are lognormally distributed, and I'd like to summarize the distribution using the mean and standard deviation. I've read that with lognormal distributions the goemetric mean and standard deviation should be used, but using them produces slightly strange results.
Specifically, when using the sample mean and standard deviation I calculate that 86% of my data lie within +/- 1 standard deviation about the mean.
However, when I use the geometric mean and standard deviation I calculate that only ~5% of my data lie within +/- 1 standard deviation about the mean.
I have over 30,000 pieces of data, and the distribution looks strongly lognormal, but I don't really understand these results. Is it valid to use the geometric mean and standard deviation here?