Since you already apparently answered your own question in respect of everything but the median, I'll address that.
[However, while the mean for the Cauchy is undefined, I'd contend that it's possible to argue that the variance of the Cauchy is infinity (while its usually given as undefined because the mean is undefined, I think we could at least make an argument that it should be infinity, since variance can be defined without reference to the mean). I don't know that a value of infinity is necessarily poorly defined, but "undefined" would certainly seem to be. In any case, there will be situations where the variance doesn't exist, so either way your point is still okay.]
Note that the definition of the median is not unique. If there's a region with density zero, with half the probability either side of that region, the definition of the median you give is satisfied by every $m$ in the region.
So the question arises as to whether that's enough to consider that definition of the median "not well-defined".
an expression is well-defined if it is unambiguous and its objects are independent of their representation
So the question comes down to whether we regard a definition we specify as "the median" is unambiguous when it can be any value in an interval. Perhaps "a median" would be more appropriate.
(Of course we can follow some convention and define it uniquely, but we're dealing with the definition in your question.)
Judging by some of the examples on that wikipedia page, I think it can be argued that the median isn't well-defined.
Note that my discussion is entirely based on taking it to be an attempt to define the median as a point. If we allow that the median is more generally an interval, as Henry suggested in comments below, then it's well-defined.