4
$\begingroup$

There are hundreds if not thousands of textbooks that detail how to make population inferences from sample.

However for almost all my applications at work I have the entire population of data for which I'm interested in.

My general question is; How does the application of statistics change when we have population data, but specifically, are there any textbooks or readings that I could go through to familiarize myself with this topic?

Related: Does it make sense to compute confidence intervals and to test hypotheses when data from whole population is available?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Sampling from a population is far from the only kind of process that generates uncertainty. Most statistical analysis can be phrased as modelling when you haven't measured everything that might be important and even less everything that might have some influence on a response. Even having all the possible observations doesn't mean you have all the possible variables too. $\endgroup$
    – Nick Cox
    Commented Sep 23, 2014 at 18:34

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

The Traveling Wilburys-like quartet of economists Abadie, Athey, Imbens and Wooldridge have a nice paper on this in the context of causal inference and robust standard errors. To summarize and simplify, these standard errors capture the fact that even if we observe outcomes for all units in the population of interest, there are for each unit missing potential outcomes for the treatment levels the unit was not exposed to.

What does all that mean? For example, suppose you want to figure out what the effect of legalized marijuana on pizza sales. You're comparing sales per capita for Washington and Colorado to all the other states. The standard errors reflect that you haven't observed the state of the world where Washington and Colorado did not legalize and the states of the world where other states legalized first. Other times you want to extrapolate your estimates to the future, which you have also not observed. In all these cases, you only have a subset of the full population and so the standard errors of the causal estimate reflect that sampling variability.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is exactly the start point I needed. Thank you so much $\endgroup$
    – canyon289
    Commented Sep 24, 2014 at 17:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.