5
$\begingroup$

Say I have a time series regression as follows: $$y_t = a_i + \beta_i x_t + \varepsilon_t^i \ \ ; \ \ t = 1, 2, \cdots, T \ \ \text{for each } i$$ Now say I impose the following restriction on the intercept, $a_i$: $$a_i = \beta_i[\lambda - E(x)]$$ where $\lambda$ is a constant and $E(\cdot)$ denotes the expectation.

How can I use GMM to write down a set of moment conditions that I can use to estimate this model and test the restriction on $a_i$?

Attempt: I know how to do this if there was no restrictions on $a_i$.

Let $b$ denote the vector of parameters, i.e., $b = [a \ \ \beta]'$. Then we know from GMM theory that $Var(\widehat{b}) = \frac{1}{T}d^{-1}Sd^{-1 \prime}$ where $d = \frac{\partial g_T(b)}{\partial b'}$ and $g_T(b)$ denotes the sample moment conditions, i.e., $$g_T(b) = \begin{bmatrix} E_T(y_t - a_i - \beta_i x_t) \\ E_T(y_t - a_i - \beta_i x_t)x_t \end{bmatrix} = E_T\left(\begin{bmatrix}\varepsilon_t \\ x_t \varepsilon_t \end{bmatrix}\right)$$ where $E_T(\cdot) = \frac{1}{T}\sum_{t=1}^{T} (\cdot)$.

$S$ is given by: $$S = \sum_{j=-\infty}^{\infty}\begin{bmatrix} E(\varepsilon_t \varepsilon_{t-j}') & E(\varepsilon_t \varepsilon_{t-j}' x_{t-j}) \\ E(x_t \varepsilon_t \varepsilon_{t-j}') & E(x_t \varepsilon_t \varepsilon_{t-j}' x_{t-j}) \end{bmatrix}$$ which can be simplified further assuming the errors are uncorrelated and not heteroskedastic.

Now once there are restrictions on $a_i$, how do I proceed?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

If your function looked like: $$a_i=\beta_i\lambda$$ or you perfectly knew $E(x)$ all you would need to do is rewrite your moment restrictions with the inclusion of the restriction. That is:

$$ g_T(b)=E_T\left[\matrix{ y_{i,t} - \beta_{i}\lambda - \beta_{i}x_{i,t}\\ (y_{i,t}-\beta_{i,t}\lambda-\beta_{i}x_{i,t})x_{i,t} } \right] $$

(actually I'd write this out in terms of individual specific moments if $\beta_i$ is truly an individual level variable, but that's a different point).

You then run this through your favorite optimization routine, with the weight matrix you described. The problem with:

$$a_i=\beta_i [\lambda-E(x)]$$

is that you probably do not know $E(x)$, so you have to account for sampling variation. What you should do is define a parameter $\mu=E(x)$, and rewrite your moments:

$$ g_T(b)=E_T\left[\matrix{ y_{i,t} - \beta_{i}[\lambda-\mu] - \beta_{i}x_{i,t}\\ (y_{i,t}-\beta_{i}[\lambda-\mu]-\beta_{i}x_{i,t})x_{i,t}\\ x_{i,t}-\mu } \right]$$

with a corresponding weight matrix. You can derive a weight matrix for this, or (my preferred option) use iterated GMM.

This is a just-identified estimator. You can come up with over-identified estimators for this problem by using first-differences if you want.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.