0
$\begingroup$

I have a conceptual problem in a rather large study of the following design: technical details of a telephone connection are monitored daily, and at the end of the month a questionnaire is filled out by the participants to ask them about their experience. So, in theory I would have 28-31 daily recordings and a single measurement of the experience.

In my mind, the best step to analyze the data would be to aggregate the daily recordings and use some form of regression to find relationships between the aggregated data and the experience.

Unfortunately, the process to gather the technical details has a lot of faults, so a lot of the cases are missing, around 50% of all participants could be observed on 10 days or less. Even worse, the process which leads to missing data is not random at all, so simply doing some sort of replacement is out of the window.

Has somebody an idea how to aggregate the data in a meaningful way? Even a simple average can be problematic because in some causes it's the average of 30 data points, in other only two data points. Even worse, there are a lot of variables like the total download volume where a sum would be great, but at the moment a sum would be misleading at best.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ When missing mechanism is not random it is a good thing not BAD. $\endgroup$ – Chamberlain Foncha Oct 21 '14 at 9:54
  • $\begingroup$ @ChamberlainFoncha Normally I would agree - but the process which leads to the missing data depends on external variables which are not present in my dataset and it is safe to assume that the mechanism would change the variables drastically. Some more detail: I can only observe say 3G connections, 4G is impossible. Now I knew why the data are missing, but have no way to predict the missing ones, or do I miss something $\endgroup$ – Christian Sauer Oct 21 '14 at 10:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.