# Why isn't Logistic Regression called Logistic Classification?

Since Logistic Regression is a statistical classification model dealing with categorical dependent variables, why isn't it called Logistic Classification? Shouldn't the "Regression" name be reserved to models dealing with continuous dependent variables?

• Logistic regression belongs to the GLM family of models. – Stéphane Laurent Dec 7 '14 at 19:04
• You can use it to regress probabilities. – Emre Dec 7 '14 at 22:38
• While logistic regression can certainly be used for classification by introducing a threshold on the probabilities it returns, that's hardly its only use - or even its primary use. It was developed for - and continues to be used for - regression purposes that have nothing to do with classification. I'd argue that this is still easily what it's mostly used for, but I suppose it depends on what you look at. – Glen_b -Reinstate Monica Dec 8 '14 at 1:07
• You might find this paper on the development of logistic regression interesting, particularly since it does give some sense of the kinds of problems that it is used for as a regression technique. – Glen_b -Reinstate Monica Dec 8 '14 at 1:14

Logistic regression is emphatically not a classification algorithm on its own. It is only a classification algorithm in combination with a decision rule that makes dichotomous the predicted probabilities of the outcome. Logistic regression is a regression model because it estimates the probability of class membership as a (transformation of a) multilinear function of the features.

Frank Harrell has posted a number of answers on this website enumerating the pitfalls of regarding logistic regression as a classification algorithm. Among them:

If I recall correctly, he once pointed me to his book on regression strategies for more elaboration on these (and more!) points, but I can't seem to find that particular post.

• If that's the case, all(or most) the classifiers predicts the probabilities to belong in a class first(as far as I know) and then transform this prob to classes.. Don't they? – Outlier Dec 10 '14 at 6:51
• @Outlier Counterexample: SVM doesn't compute class probabilities at all, it just measures the distance between an observation and a hyperplane. – Sycorax says Reinstate Monica Dec 10 '14 at 12:59
• @Outlier in ML these are called probabilistic classifiers; trees and random forest are not, xgboost is - at least with logloss) – seanv507 May 25 '19 at 6:46
• @SycoraxsaysReinstateMonica So is there any classification algorithm in the world? SVMs compute distance from the class boundary, Neural Networks compute some other continuous function... – Igor F. Dec 19 '19 at 11:56
• @IgorF. Any algorithm with a decision rule discretizing the output as classes is a classifier. Logistic regression is properly named because it's a regression of class probabilities. – Sycorax says Reinstate Monica Dec 19 '19 at 13:09

Abstractly, regression is the problem of calculating a conditional expectation $E[Y|X=x]$. The form taken by this expectation is different depending on the assumptions of how the data were generated:

• Assuming (Y|X=x) to be normally distributed yields with classical linear regression.
• Assuming a Poisson distribution yields Poisson regression.
• Assuming a Bernoulli distribution yields logistic regression.

The term "regression" has also been used more generally than this, including approaches like quantile regression, which estimates a given quantile of $(Y|X=x)$.

Apart from already provided good answers, another view is that Logistic regression predicts probabilities (which is continuous value) that have got range from 0 to 1. • what happens if u insert the outcome y of your linear model into another linear model (can think of it as an extreme case of sigmoid with very gentle change of gradient. Will that work for classification? If not why? – Zzy1130 Feb 5 at 8:04