11
$\begingroup$

In a paper I've written I model the random variables $X+Y$ and $X-Y$ rather than $X$ and $Y$ to effectively remove the problems that arise when $X$ and $Y$ are highly correlated and have equal variance (as they are in my application). The referees want me to give a reference. I could easily prove it, but being an application journal they prefer a reference to a simple mathematical derivation.

Does anyone have any suggestions for a suitable reference? I thought there was something in Tukey's EDA book (1977) on sums and differences but I can't find it.

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Wikipedia has a reference to a textbook at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… ; not sure that helps... $\endgroup$
    – shabbychef
    Jul 27, 2011 at 3:42
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ And the prove indeed is more than trivial with equal variances :( $Cov(X+Y,X-Y) = E((X-\mu_X)+(Y-\mu_Y))((X-\mu_X)-(Y-\mu_Y)) = Var X - Var Y = 0$... Good luck, Rob. $\endgroup$ Jul 27, 2011 at 10:25
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Tukey doesn't prove anything in EDA: he proceeds by example. For an example of looking at $y+x$ versus $y-x$ see Exhibit 3 of chapter 14, p. 473 (the discussion begins on p. 470). $\endgroup$
    – whuber
    Jul 27, 2011 at 13:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ One alternative way to get around having to provide a reference. You can consider it a case of modelling the principal components of your data $X,Y$, rather than the individual variables themselves. That would be an easy thing to provide a reference for $\endgroup$ Jul 29, 2011 at 23:13
  • 2

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

I would refer to Seber GAF (1977) Linear regression analysis. Wiley, New York. Theorem 1.4.

This says $\text{cov}(AX, BY) = A \text{cov}(X,Y) B'$.

Take $A$ = (1 1) and $B$ = (1 -1) and $X$ = $Y$ = vector with your X and Y.

Note that, to have $\text{cov}(X+Y, X-Y) \approx 0$, it's critical that X and Y have the similar variances. If $\text{var}(X) \gg \text{var}(Y)$, $\text{cov}(X+Y, X-Y)$ will be large.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ For $W$ and $Z$ to be uncorrelated (or nearly uncorrelated), we don't need $\operatorname{cov}(W,Z)$ to be $0$ or nearly $0$: we need the Pearson correlation coefficient $\rho_{W,Z}$ to be $0$ or nearly $0$. $\endgroup$ Aug 22, 2014 at 15:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.