Apologies if I haven't got the terminology quite right. I have a question about Neural Networks, and I'm not sure exactly the best way to ask it!

Hypothetically, let's say I have a dataset of houses on the property market. One of the features could be number of bathrooms, and another is floor plan area.

If I were using linear regression, I might also include a compound feature e.g. number of bathrooms / floor plan area. I could come up with all sorts of combinations of feature products, and create higher order polynomials.

My question is - is this necessary for neural networks? Or standard practise? Or useful?

Neural networks are such a black box I'm not sure if it would just "work this out" or not.

If there isn't a simple answer, I would be grateful at least for anything you can tell me about how this phenomenon is referred to. Are they compound features? Or computed features? I really don't know...


1 Answer 1


composite features can be useful but you probably wouldn't want to use the elements of a composite feature and the composite feature itself as inputs to the same model unless each was meaningful a priori (and even then, maybe not). The net will be able to learn about the summation of two features (and other relationships) without combining them.

a great use for composite features can be when you want to do large scale machine learning and cut down on processing requirements

so not necessary but occasionally useful

one caveat - the nature of a feature might call for a transformation (square root, polynomial transformation) to increase the fit of a simple model but that is a separate issue from combining features into a composite feature


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.