1
$\begingroup$

I have a dataset of a few thousand employees and want to compare time-to-terminate by their source of hire. The data is for a four year period. Out of the dataset about 15% have terminated, while the rest are still with the company.

I considered survival analysis but the employees started at many different times. Is there anyway to work around this? Or is there a more appropriate analysis?

Thanks!

EDIT: I found this paper which explains how to handle my problem of variable sample size: http://www.amstat.org/chapters/northeasternillinois/pastevents/presentations/summer05_Ibrahim_J.pdf

$\endgroup$
3

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

You shouldn't need to "work around" different start times with survival analysis software, that's par for the course. You'll have a lot of right censoring (employees who are still there), which the software should also be able to handle.

You'll still have to make sure to use it properly, and to worry about things like left truncation (employees who quit before your records start), but if you set things up properly, it sounds like you've chosen the appropriate approach.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Hi Wayne,thank you for your help. I thought that everyone in the model had to be present at time 0 in order to accurately compare the amount of time they stayed. If 10 were present at t0,and 5 left at t1, but 10 also joined at t1, wouldn't that effect the curve? $\endgroup$ Feb 7, 2015 at 17:35
  • $\begingroup$ The technique isn't basing everything on the number of employees at $t_n$, if that's what you're afraid of. In your example, the fact that 10 employees are present at $t_0$ -- presumably hired before $t_0$ -- is more of a complicating factor than employees coming and going. $\endgroup$
    – Wayne
    Feb 7, 2015 at 20:38
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you Wayne. I limited the data so that no one started before my t0. The employee hired the earliest will have his or her date be the t0. And so it sounds like it doesn't matter if only 5% or 100% of the population was present at t0 because the software "corrects" for this. If you have any recommended articles or books on this, please let me know. Thanks! $\endgroup$ Feb 8, 2015 at 17:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.