Question: What are the major pitfalls and assumptions for competing risk analysis?


I'm trying to learn competing risks and I use the cmprsk package in R based upon Gray's algorithm. I've read Melania Pintilie's book, Competing Risks: A practical perspective, but although it's a very nice introduction to the field I lack a list of the common pitfalls. My mentor has warned me about the competing risk analysis still being a developing field and I would therefore really appreciate if I could get your opinions on this.

In the answer to this question it's mentioned:

just make sure that you understand what assumptions you are making

As I understand it the major assumption is the proportional hazards, similar to the Cox model, but other than that assumption I'm not sure that I know what other assumptions and pitfalls I'm to look out for.


1 Answer 1


Pintile's book is an excellent book for understanding competing risks but if you want to study theoretical side of the competing risks, take a look at Martin J. Crowder's book, Classical Competing Risks.

I wrote my master's thesis on competing risks and from what I remember, they are some drawbacks/disadvantages when competing risks analysis is conducted. The most well-known problem is an issue of identifiability. There were many papers and journals regarding this issue when I was preparing my thesis and I believe many scholars are still writing papers about this.

The issue of identifiability arises due to the nature of competing risks modelling -- when death or failure has observed from an identifiable cause-of-failure it cannot occur again later from another case.

Another issue arises when the cause of failure for a subject or unit is NOT precisely identified, it can be narrowed down to a subset of the potential risks. This phenomenon is called masking.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for your answer - +1 for the references. $\endgroup$
    – Max Gordon
    Apr 27, 2012 at 7:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.