2
$\begingroup$

I usually use mean±SD notation for reporting values. I know that many people use mean (SD) notation and I understand why.

Right now in the document I am writing I am also reporting medians but I don't know which notation I should use for the 3 measures. Any suggestions?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
4
$\begingroup$

Both conventions you mention are ambiguous - for example you can't tell whether the number after the $\pm$ is a standard deviation, a standard error, or the half-width of an interval. (a problem that has led to numerous questions on this site).

If you're publishing somewhere that offers precise guidelines follow those, but otherwise I suggest being explicit, for example: $``\text{median } 28.5,$ $\text{ mean } 31.2,$ $\text{ standard deviation } 3.6\!"$ -- then there's no possibility of misinterpretation.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ +1. I usually write $``31.2 \pm 3.6\text{ (mean}\pm\text{SD)}\!"$ and hope that this is clear enough... $\endgroup$
    – amoeba
    Mar 16, 2015 at 14:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @amoeba That's explicit, so it looks okay to me. I wasn't trying to hold people to any one format, just avoiding ambiguity; yours does that. $\endgroup$
    – Glen_b
    Mar 16, 2015 at 14:47
  • $\begingroup$ Well, I end up using 5.0 (5) ± 0.5 (2.5) [0 - 10] for the hypothesis variable (the numbers I show here are not the true values) and inserted a footnote explaining the format Mean (Median) ± SD (Q1-Q3) [Min - Max]. For all other variables, since they are presented in tables, it was inserted a table footnote explaining the format: Mean ± SD [Min - Max] or Median (Q1-Q3) $\endgroup$
    – yohanna
    Mar 23, 2015 at 14:55
1
$\begingroup$

I personally usually use Mean (Median) $\pm$ SD (IQR) [Min - Max]. That's quite maximalist, so may be a bit too much for certain purposes/readers, but is a quite logical grouping of indicators (central tendency $\pm$ dispersion, with traditional indicator first, robust alternative in parenthesis), I believe. (Minimum and maximum is of course added not because they're statistically especially important or good indicators, but because on the biomedical field it is often required for ''clinical'' purposes.)

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I actually like this idea, but only if the order is explicitly specified in the paper so the reader knows what they're looking at $\endgroup$
    – shadowtalker
    Apr 30, 2015 at 18:48
  • $\begingroup$ @ssdecontrol: Of course! I usually specify it in the - say - table caption. $\endgroup$
    – Tamas Ferenci
    May 1, 2015 at 18:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.