Suppose there are four models:

Model 1: $y = ax$

Model 2: $y = ax^2$

Model 3: $y = a\sqrt{x}$

Model 4: $y = ax^\theta$

Model 4 is the most complex model with two parameters (the others have one parameter). If we do model selection (e.g., based on AIC or LRT), when the estimated $\theta$ is close to 1, it is likely (of course not necessarily but) that Model 1 is selected. However, suppose estimated $\theta$ is very close to 1.3 and Model 4 is selected, we do not say, e.g., Model 5 ($y=ax^{1.3}$) is selected.

My questions is when is it ok to assume a specific value in a model? In the above example, what is so special about 1, 2, and 0.5? Does this depend the specific questions?

  • $\begingroup$ Note that you can only do an LRT of model 4 against each of the three other models, not of, e.g., model 1 against model 2. The reason is that models 1–3 are nested in model 4, but model 1 is not nested in model 2 (you can’t get from model 2 to model 1 by setting one parameter to a certain value, or vice versa). That said, if you have enough observations to reliably estimate the parameters, and you know that model 4 is adequate, I would go for that model. $\endgroup$ Mar 28, 2015 at 9:54

1 Answer 1


In cases when we know the power exactly (i. e. physical laws), the power is most often 1. When it is not 1, it is often 2 or 0.5. Therefore, the prior probability that the power is 1, 2, or 0.5 is very high. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that $\theta$ is probably 1, 2, or 0.5 if we know that $\theta$ is close to one of these values, and the difference is not statistically significant.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.