0
$\begingroup$

I am working on an observational prospective longitudinal study with a repeated measures design. The same categorical outcome is measured for five times, for all the participants, over a time period. So there are five outcome (dependent) variables and a few predictor variables. First of all, I would like to compare the proportion of a value in the first outcome variable, compared to its proportion in every of the other four outcome variables, and find out if it's significantly smaller as assumed.

I have a few questions:

1) Can I use a statistical analysis on two outcome variables, without including predictor variables?

2) What statistical analysis should I use?

3) For some of the participants there are missing values in one or more of the five outcome variables. How should I deal with it in my analysis?

Thanks!

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

It sounds like you'd want to use a generalized estimating equations (GEE) or mixed model for this analysis where the participant is a random effect. You'd use a contrasts to determine if the first measurements is different from the average of the other four. You could even try a Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach too.

To deal with missing data, I'd recommend using multiple imputation.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ But GEE does rather was generally with missing data, assuming you have a relatively large number of participants. $\endgroup$ Jun 2, 2015 at 21:01
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the answer! More specifically, I am looking for risk factors for the outcome, expressed by Odds Ratios. But In some other post I have read, that GEE estimates of associations are notoriously inefficient. Is GEE an appropriate method in my case? $\endgroup$
    – Alex
    Jun 15, 2015 at 23:07
  • $\begingroup$ Before evaluating all of the predictors, I just want to find the OR for the outcome in every of the 2nd to 5th time points, compared to the first time point (as a predictor), and not the average of the other four. How can I do that? It seems that in GEE the exposure should always be at the same person-time point as the outcome. It also seems that GEE doesn't evaluate time points separately. $\endgroup$
    – Alex
    Jun 15, 2015 at 23:07
  • $\begingroup$ GEE should be fine for what you describe above. You'll handle the tests using a contrast. A good introductory text to help guide your analysis can be foundin Chapter 25 of Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods by Kleinbaum, et al. amazon.com/Applied-Regression-Analysis-Multivariable-Methods/dp/…. In this chapter this are some good examples that show constrasts to estimates different times points like you are trying to do using GEE (aka the marginal model). $\endgroup$ Jun 17, 2015 at 5:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.