I am currently estimating a cointegrating regression (DOLS), where my residuals have autocorrelation. Sometimes it is just in one or two lags, but sometimes it is more. My question is: Can I apply HAC and carry on with my estimation? I.e. would HAC standard errors compensate for the autocorrelation?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I edited the title in the hope of making it more informative. I hope I did not misrepresent your point. It is an interesting question, but looks like a tough one, too... $\endgroup$ – Richard Hardy Jun 7 '15 at 21:52
  • $\begingroup$ In DOLS, leads and lags compensate for autocorrelation. Why would you want to use HAC s.e.s on top? $\endgroup$ – Christoph Hanck Jun 8 '15 at 3:25
  • $\begingroup$ Richard Hardy, thanks! @ChristophHanck, because I have tried every possible combination of leads and lags and some autocorrelation still remains. $\endgroup$ – econstudent Jun 8 '15 at 6:00

The motivation for including leads/lags within a DOLS is to control for bias in small samples. Actually, to be more specific the lags\leads are included to ensure that the OLS estimates are normally distributed. More importantly, lag/leads are not related to correcting for autocorrelation. These issue are first discussed in Banerjee 1986 et al, who shows that bias in introduced as a results of the strict exogeneity assumption not holding. Saikkonen 1991 is the first to suggest using lag/lead difference to control for bias.

More importantly for your application is that it is actually essential you use HAC variance. As a matter of fact the seminal paper on DOLS, Stock and Watson (1993), discusses this in-depth. Read these Zivot Notes, since they contain the essential information. For a application with Newey-West errors read this.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.