Suppose that we have this output for Logistic Regression:

     Coef   EXP(Coef)
X1   2.45     11.67
X2   0.40     1.449
X3  -4.1401   0.0159

Here X3 has highest absolute Coefficient value but lowest EXP(coef) values.

  • If we want ranking these variables based on importance we should rank based on Coef or EXP(Coef)?

  • As we can see all Exp(Coef) are positive. How we can consider negative coefs here?


1 Answer 1


Suppose all your covariates are continuous, each "Coef" represents the log odds ratio when each covariate is increased by 1 unit, while holding other covariates constant. "EXP(Coef)" is therefore the ordinary odds ratio.

To answer your first question, ideally you should not consider "Coef" or "EXP(Coef)" only, the standard error must be also taken into account. But if we assume the parameters can be estimated equally accurately, then for "Coef", you should compare the magnitude, namely, absolute value. For "EXP(Coef)", you should compare its "distance" from 1 (odds ratio = 1 means independence). The larger, or smaller the number to 1, the stronger the correlation is.

For the second question, "EXP(Coef)", i.e., (estimated) odds ratio, is of course always positive regardless the "Coef" is positive or negative. However, if "Coef" is negative, then "EXP(Coef)" is between $(0, 1)$, representing the response and covariate is partially negatively correlated. As above, when viewing it, you should compare it with 1 (instead of 0) to assess the covariate's effect. For example, 0.0159 should be considered a very strong association, as $1/0.0159 = 62.89$ is way bigger than 1.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.