1
$\begingroup$

I have a linear model with the following parameters:

                                  OLS Regression Results                                  
==========================================================================================
Dep. Variable:     TOTAL_Presented_Young_ppl_2014   R-squared:                       0.417
Model:                                        OLS   Adj. R-squared:                  0.413
Method:                             Least Squares   F-statistic:                     112.2
Date:                            Thu, 13 Aug 2015   Prob (F-statistic):           4.04e-20
Time:                                    07:31:57   Log-Likelihood:                -1124.2
No. Observations:                             159   AIC:                             2252.
Df Residuals:                                 157   BIC:                             2259.
Df Model:                                       1                                         
Covariance Type:                        nonrobust                                         
=======================================================================================
                          coef    std err          t      P>|t|      [95.0% Conf. Int.]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intercept              14.3737     31.464      0.457      0.648       -47.774    76.522
LA_Population_young     0.0128      0.001     10.592      0.000         0.010     0.015

FWIW, it's the relation between a local population and the number of young homeless people. Each data row corresponds to a district in a country.

It is not a good model, I know, but that's a different matter. My question is: What are my options for stating the error of the sum of predictions?

My final goal is to predict the number in the whole country, i.e. sum(prediction). Could I build two upper- and lower-limit predictions, based on the confidence intervals:

Y_upper = 76.552 + 0.015*X
Y_lower = -47.774 + 0.01*X

Then sum those and say my 95% confidence interval on the prediction is [sum(Y_lower), sum(Y_upper)]? Effectively I would have bounds like these: regression

Does this make sense? If not, why and what would be a better way?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

If you do a linear regression $y=\beta_1 x + \beta_2 + \epsilon$ where $\epsilon$ is a random error term, normal with mean zero and standard deviation $\sigma$ i.e. $\epsilon \sim N(0, \sigma)$, then OLS estimates three parameters: $\hat{\beta}_1, \hat{\beta}_2, \hat{\sigma}$. I don't know which software you use but in R, the $\hat{\sigma}$ can be found as 'residual standard error' in the output of the summary function.

You should use the fitted values $\hat{y}$ plus or minus two standard diviations $\hat{\sigma}$.

Because of the question in your comment I added this:

So, by the model that you have choosen, the implicit assumption is that you can never measure $y$ with precision (your model assumes that $y=\beta_1 x + \beta_2 + \epsilon$, so the imprecision you assume is implicit in the randomness of $\epsilon$ that is expressed by the parameter $\sigma$).

If you look at a textbook on Ordinary Linear Least Squares, then the assumption of normality on the error term implies that the estimators for the parameters $\hat{\beta}_i$ are normal with a standard deviation that is related to $\sigma$, so they can never be estimated with precision neither (because they are random) and you can compute their standard deviation. Therefore you can construct confidence intervals for the estimated $\hat{\beta}_i$. Note that the $\hat{\beta}_i$ are not independent, so their estimation errors may compensate. If you take for each estmated $\hat{\beta}_i$ the 'worst case' error, then you overestimate the total error.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Do you mean I should calculate the standard deviation $\sigma = \sqrt{\sum (y-\hat{y})^2/(N-2)}$ (std for a sample), and then the bounds would be $\sum (\hat{y}- 2\sigma)$ and $\sum (\hat{y}+ 2\sigma)$ ? $\endgroup$ – alkamid Aug 13 '15 at 7:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is what I mean, except that your $\sigma$ is an estimate, so it is better to use the notation $\hat{\sigma}$. $\endgroup$ – user83346 Aug 13 '15 at 7:20
  • $\begingroup$ Would you mind adding a few words about why my idea is worse/wrong? $\endgroup$ – alkamid Aug 13 '15 at 7:23
  • $\begingroup$ I added it in the answer. $\endgroup$ – user83346 Aug 13 '15 at 7:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.