2
$\begingroup$

This is just a quick query to confirm that I have this right and that my way of constructing it is correct. We were asked to prove:

$a=\frac{-1}{log(1-\theta)}$ for $p(x)=a\frac{\theta^x}{x}$ for $x=1,2,...$

Using the axiom, $P(S) = \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}f(x)=1$

So, end up with:

$\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}a\frac{\theta^x}{x}=1$

Then, using the Maclaurin Series where $\log(1-x)=-\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\frac{x^n}{n}$

Then putting this all together to get:

$-a\log(1-\theta)=1$

And then rearrange to get the required answer.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

The approach looks fine, but there's one thing I'd regard as perhaps "missing" in the argument there: checking the radius of convergence of the Maclaurin series covers the required range of $\theta$ (which is unstated, but should be $0<\theta<1$).

[Generally speaking, where possibe it's best to avoid questions where there's a potential that the answer will be simply "yes", since we're not supposed to give one-sentence answers, let alone single word ones. If possible, it's also better to try to find a question or a phrasing that will help more people, even if it becomes a bit indirect for your problem.]

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, fair. I'll try to make it more general in future. I struggle to find sufficient resources to feel comfortable with my answers because I shoot for 100% but my maths isn't as good as I'd like it to be. $\endgroup$
    – Syzorr
    Commented Sep 3, 2015 at 2:14

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.