0
$\begingroup$

For a product space $\Omega = \Omega_1 \times ... \times \Omega_n$ and its distribution (a probability function) $P$,

the $i$th marginal distribution is:

$$P_i(\omega_i)=\sum_{t\in \Omega: t_i=\omega_i} P(t)$$ where $\omega_i \in \Omega_i$.

What does the condition ${t\in \Omega: t_i=\omega_i}$ mean?

Here it's claimed that the marginal distributions appear in the "margins" of the following table:

enter image description here

I don't see the connection to the equation. What is the $i$th margin distribution in that table?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

$t$ is an $n$-tuple $(t_1,t_2,\ldots,t_n)$ whose $i$-th component is a member of $\Omega_i$. The sum is over all $t$ such that the $i$-th component is a fixed element $\omega$ of $\Omega_i$, not $\omega_i$ as it is written. The notation leaves much to be desired.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I still don't get it. Would need to see a small practical example of how to do the "drawing" of the elements. Or to know how to know how many terms the sum has. $\endgroup$ – mavavilj Nov 8 '15 at 14:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Dilip, "$\omega_i$" appears correctly in the notation, which has the desirable property of being explicit about which margin is involved. Unfortunately it does overburden the poor subscript "$i$", which it uses both for naming various objects ($\Omega_i$, $P_i$, and $\omega_i$) and to represent the image of the canonical projection $\pi_i:\Omega\to\Omega_i$ via the shorthand $t_i = \pi_i(t)$. Presumably this is because the author thinks of each $t\in\Omega$ implicitly as a tuple $(t_1,\ldots,t_i,\ldots,t_n)$. $\endgroup$ – whuber Nov 8 '15 at 14:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.