Below is the beginning of an example in Ross' First Course in Probability (p.97):
EXAMPLE 5d
At a party, n men take off their hats. The hats are then mixed up, and each man randomly selects one. We say that a match occurs if a man selects his own hat. What is the probability of no matches?
Solution.
Let E denote the event that no matches occur, and to make explicit the dependence on n, write $P_n$ = P(E). We start by conditioning on whether or not first man selects his own hat—call these events M and $M^c$, respectively. Then $P_n$ = P(E) = P(E|M)P(M) + P(E|$M^c$)P($M^c$)
Clearly, P(E|M) = 0, so $P_n$ = P(E|$M^c$)$\frac{n − 1}{n}$
I understand that first part perfectly, now the next part confuses me.
Now, P(E|$M^c$) is the probability of no matches when n − 1 men select from a set of n − 1 hats that does not contain the hat of one of these men. This can happen in either of two mutually exclusive ways: Either there are no matches and the extra man does not select the extra hat (this being the hat of the man who chose first), or there are no matches and the extra man does select the extra hat. The probability of the first of these events is just $P_{n−1}$, which is seen by regarding the extra hat as “belonging” to the extra man. Because the second event has probability $\frac{1}{n − 1} P_{n−2}$, we have P(E|$M^c$) = $P_{n−1} + \frac{1}{n − 1}P_{n−2}$.
I'm not sure what Ross is referring to when he says the extra man. It seems like the extra hat is the hat of the man who chose first. If someone could please clarify how Ross obtained this last equation, I would be grateful. Thanks.