5
$\begingroup$

I am trying to estimate a model using control function approach

(I will write all the variables in a scalar form so that it is easier to explain):

The main equation:

$y_1 = \beta_0 + \beta_1 \times w + \beta_2 \times y_2 + \beta_3 \times w \ast y_2 + \beta_4 \times x_1 + \beta_5 \times x_2 + u_1 $

where the interaction term $w\ast y_2$ is mainly of interest. $w$ is exogenous. $x_1$ and $x_2$ are other control variables. However, I have theoretical reasons to believe that $y_2$ is endogenous and affected by $w$, something like:

$y_2 = \gamma_0 + \gamma_1 \times w + \gamma_2 \times z + \gamma_3 \times x_1 + \gamma_4 \times x_2 + u_2$

where $z$ is a scalar or a set of additional exogenous variables.
Here are the steps I followed to estimate this model:

  1. Regress $y_2$ on $w, z, x_1, x_2$ and obtain $\hat{u_2}$
  2. Regress $y_1$ on $w, y_2, w \ast y_2, x_1, x_2, \hat{u_2}$

Is it the correct approach? I am a little confused because in Wooldridge (2010) (p.270) it has an example:

$y_1 = \boldsymbol{z}_1 \boldsymbol{\delta}_1 + \alpha_{11} y_2 + \alpha_{12} y_3 + \alpha_{13} y_2 y_3 + y_2 \boldsymbol{z}_1 \boldsymbol{\gamma}_{11} + y_3 \boldsymbol{z}_1 \boldsymbol{\gamma}_{12}+u_1$

$y_2 = \boldsymbol{z}\boldsymbol{\beta}_2 + u_2$

$y_3 = \boldsymbol{z}\boldsymbol{\beta}_3 + u_3$

$\boldsymbol{z}$ and $\boldsymbol{z}_1$ are exonogenous.

The estimation is done by regress $y_{i1}$ on $\boldsymbol{z}_{i1}, y_{i2}, y_{i3}, y_{i2}y_{i3}, y_{i2}\boldsymbol{z}_{i1}, y_{i3}\boldsymbol{z}_{i1}, \hat{u_{i2}}, \hat{u_{i3}}$.

In the first equation $\boldsymbol{z}_1$ are the only exogenous variables. Does it mean the control variables are in this vector, and I should have the interaction terms between $y_2$ (or $y_3$) and each of variables in $\boldsymbol{z}_1$, including all the controls? It does not feel right but the text seems to suggest so.

There are a number of posts on line talking about endogenous interaction terms and 2SLS seems to be the common method. If the control function approach does not work here, how would I estimate my model using Stata?

Any help is appreciated!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Are both the outcome and endogenous variables continuous? $\endgroup$ – Marquis de Carabas Apr 13 '16 at 17:49
0
$\begingroup$

You have two endogenous variables, $y_2$ and $w * y_2$. You should:

  1. Regress $y_2$ on $w$, $z$, $w * z$, and the $x$'s. Obtain the residuals, $\hat{u}_2$.
  2. Regress $w*y_2$ on $w$, $z$, $w * z$, and the $x$'s. Obtain the residuals, $\hat{u}_3$.
  3. Regress $y_1$ on $w$, $y_2$, $w*y_2$, the $x$'s, $\hat{u}_2$ and $\hat{u}_3$.

For two stage least squares, instead of the residuals in step 1 & 2, you obtain the fitted values, and then in step 3, you regress $y_1$ on $w$, $\hat{y}_2$, $\widehat{w*y_2}$, and the $x$'s. Either procedure gives the same estimates.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.