0
$\begingroup$

I have a question according the "formula interface" from GEE models, for instance when using the gee function from the R gee package.

Let's say I have a measured quality of life (QoL), education and sex from 100 subjects at three different time points (time). If I understand the GEE model approach correctly, GEE can be used for longitudinal, clustered data. However, I wonder what my clusters would be? The cluster variable is passed to the argument id within the gee function, so what would be the right syntax if I want to measure change in QoL over time, and how this change differs depending on education and sex?

  1. Is time my cluster variable?

gee(QoL ~ education + sex, id = time)

  1. Is the subject-ID my cluster?

gee(QoL ~ education + sex + time, id = subject-ID)

However, this looks like a random slope approach of mixed models to me.

  1. Is probably education my cluster?

gee(QoL ~ sex + time, id = education)

  1. Last: I don't have any real clusters. But what would I then choose to analyze the longitudinal data, to account for the correlation of my DV QoL for same subjects at different time points?

Maybe I'm confused because I try to compare the formula syntax to the one from longitudinal data analysis with lme4, where the decision which variables to choose for random intercept and slope is quite clear (time and subject) - however, if I do not have individual differences (i.e. I'm interested in the population average), what are the clusters in GEE model for?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

You will want to use subject (or subject ID) as your cluster. GEE takes into account the repeated measurements on clusters, in this case the repeated measure is on individuals over time. So, you'd want to use

gee(QoL ~ education + sex + time, id = subject-ID)

An easy way to determine what the cluster is, is to determine what object are multiple measurements being taken on. In this case, the multiple measurements are being made on a subject. You aren't making measurements on "a time" or on "an education."

By the way, I would recommend using geeglm as you can control the ordering of the measurements using the waves argument to geeglm, which I find is usually needed.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for clarification! I have looked at the geeglm package, seems to be similar to the gee package according formula syntax. I will give it a try. $\endgroup$ – Daniel Jan 27 '16 at 21:02
  • $\begingroup$ No problem. In my experience geeglm is easier to use and it takes a better accounting of ordered observations. $\endgroup$ – StatsStudent Jan 27 '16 at 21:06
  • $\begingroup$ Just a short question for clarification: What is the difference in application of the nlme::gls function? When do I use gls? It can also deal with auto correlated residuals in longitudinal data, right? $\endgroup$ – Daniel Jan 27 '16 at 21:51
  • $\begingroup$ Another question: would I use argument waves = time and not use time as predictor in my formula? $\endgroup$ – Daniel Jan 28 '16 at 7:59
  • $\begingroup$ You would want time in the model statement. Use waves to indicate the ordering of the measurements according to cluster and time within cluster. $\endgroup$ – StatsStudent Jan 28 '16 at 8:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.