1
$\begingroup$

I've been using stepAIC to narrow down my logistic regression model. However, I get the following warning when I run my model:

glm.fit: fitted probabilities numerically 0 or 1 occurred

I know this means I have complete or quasi-complete separation in my data. On examination of my data, I see the quasi-complete separation and think that it's meaningful. Reading online, I see recommendations to use a Firth penalized regression (logistf) or exact logistic regression (elrm); but neither of these will work with stepAIC. I've also tried bayesglm but I still get the same warning.

How should I select a model when my data has complete separation? How would I do this in R? Is my mistake in my stats or in my understanding of using the packages in R? Any help would be much appreciated!

$\endgroup$
2

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

See High p-values for logistic regression variable that perfectly separates? & How to deal with perfect separation in logistic regression? for some background. If stepwise selection were appropriate (take @gung's advice to read Algorithms for automatic model selection), a straightforward approach would be just to make the decisions based on likelihood-ratio tests (equivalently AIC), as the Wald tests will be badly wrong.

Perhaps you could take a similar approach with Firth regression: Heinze & Schemper (2002), "A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression", Statist. Med., 21, pp 2409–19, form a penalized log likelihood ratio test statistic for the null hypothesis that a given coefficient is zero analogously to the unpenalized version, & imply that its asymptotic distribution is also chi-square with one degree of freedom. (By the way, "problem" is rather a loaded term.)

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.